1958
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.112.1141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collisions of Electrons with Hydrogen Atoms. I. Ionization

Abstract: The cross section for ionization of the hydrogen atom on electron impact has been measured as a function of electron energy. A modulated beam of atoms and molecules in varying proportions, taken from a furnace, is crossed by a dc electron beam, and the positive ions formed are taken into a mass spectrometer. By using such modulation techniques, the ions formed by ionization of the beam are distinguished from the much larger number of ions formed by collisions of electrons with the residual gas in the vacuum ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental situation is that the cross section is known to high accuracy (statistical errors of order 3%%uo) over the energy range from 14.6 eV to 4 keV through the pulsed crossedbearn measurements of Shah, Elliott, and Gilbody [1]. Their experiment supersedes the earlier studies of Fite and Brackmann [2] and Rothe et al [3]. The recent experiment of Shyn [4] yields results that are 2&o higher than those of Shah, Elliott, and Gilbody.…”
mentioning
confidence: 31%
“…The experimental situation is that the cross section is known to high accuracy (statistical errors of order 3%%uo) over the energy range from 14.6 eV to 4 keV through the pulsed crossedbearn measurements of Shah, Elliott, and Gilbody [1]. Their experiment supersedes the earlier studies of Fite and Brackmann [2] and Rothe et al [3]. The recent experiment of Shyn [4] yields results that are 2&o higher than those of Shah, Elliott, and Gilbody.…”
mentioning
confidence: 31%
“…In light of the uncertainty in the equivalence between optical and charged particle transparency for the two meshes, and with some reasonable assumptions about the efficiency curve provided by Mullard, we assign a conservative value of ± 0.025 to the uncertainty in 8. For the total ionization cross section, aI' we use the value of (0.762 ± 0.038) x 10-17 cm2 recently determined by Shah, Elliot, and Gilbody [43]. We note that this value is consistent with that obtained from the earlier absolute measurement of Fite and Brackman [44] at 20 eV and scaled downward to 15 eV in accordance with the relative measurements of McGowan and Clark [7]. With an ionization rate of 450 protons/s for an incident electron intensity of 10 nA, we obtain a value of (1.9±0.7) x 1010 atoms/cm3 for Peff, where we quote an overall uncertainty that includes the effect of the~100 meV resolution (full width at half maximum) of the electron beam 413 and the uncertainty in its energy centroid, as well as the specific uncertainties in 8 and aI and to a minor degree Re.…”
Section: Ar+alsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The cross-section 13 of hydrogen for electrons is ∼4 × 10 −17 cm 2 (Fite & Brackmann 1958), which implies a mean free path for ionized electrons of ∼2R J in the surrounding medium. As a result, nearly 2/3 of released energetic electrons will ionize a hydrogen atom within ∼2R J , and more than 99% will ionize a hydrogen atom within ∼10R J .…”
Section: Ionization Of Stellar Wind Particles Around the Planetmentioning
confidence: 99%