2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-018-0677-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collisionless shock heating of heavy ions in SN 1987A

Abstract: UkraineAstrophysical shocks at all scales, from those in the heliosphere up to the cosmological shock waves, are typically "collisionless", because the thickness of their jump region is much shorter than the collisional mean free path. Across these jumps, electrons, protons, and ions are expected to be heated at different temperatures. Supernova remnants (SNRs) are ideal targets to study collisionless processes because of their bright post-shock emission and fast shocks.Although optical observations of Balmer-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependence 𝜒 ∝ 𝑚/𝑞, and mass dependence of the energization (11,13) could explain observations that heavy ions in the C,N,O group have fluxes larger than protons at high energies (Stasiewicz et al 2013;Turner et al 2018). This is also consistent with observation of heavy ion temperatures 𝑇 𝑖 ∝ 𝑚 𝑖 /𝑚 𝑝 in post-shocks of supernova remnants (Raymond et al 2017;Miceli et al 2019;Gedalin 2020). However, there are also other explanations for the preferential heating of heavy ions (Zank et al 1996(Zank et al , 2001Shapiro et al 2001).…”
Section: Comparison With Observationssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The dependence 𝜒 ∝ 𝑚/𝑞, and mass dependence of the energization (11,13) could explain observations that heavy ions in the C,N,O group have fluxes larger than protons at high energies (Stasiewicz et al 2013;Turner et al 2018). This is also consistent with observation of heavy ion temperatures 𝑇 𝑖 ∝ 𝑚 𝑖 /𝑚 𝑝 in post-shocks of supernova remnants (Raymond et al 2017;Miceli et al 2019;Gedalin 2020). However, there are also other explanations for the preferential heating of heavy ions (Zank et al 1996(Zank et al , 2001Shapiro et al 2001).…”
Section: Comparison With Observationssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…From the model results, we synthesized the thermal X-ray emission originating from the impact of the blast wave with the nebula, by following the approach outlined in previous studies (Orlando et al 2015;Miceli et al 2019). The system was rotated about the three axes to fit the orientation of the ring in the plane of the sky inferred from the analysis of optical data (Sugerman et al 2005): i x = 41 o , i y = −8 o , and i z = −9 o .…”
Section: Synthesis Of X-ray Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adopting the approach described in Greco et al 2020 (see also Miceli et al 2019), we self-consistently synthesized X-ray spectra from our simulations in a format virtually identical to that of Chandra ACIS-S observations. The synthesis includes the deviations from equilibrium of ionization and from temperature-equilibration between electrons and protons, and takes into account the chemical composition of ejecta and ISM resulting from the simulations in each computational cell (see e.g., Miceli et al 2019;Orlando et al 2019 for more details). For the spectral synthesis, we assume a distance of 1 kpc and a column density N H = 2 × 10 21 cm −2 with an exposure time of 100 ks.…”
Section: Synthesis Of X-ray Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%