1998
DOI: 10.1006/icar.1998.5960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collisional Models and Scaling Laws: A New Interpretation of the Shape of the Main-Belt Asteroid Size Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
191
1
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
191
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The t = 0 My timestep shows our initial conditions. The t = 3 My timestep shows a bump developing near D ∼ 2-3 km for both N rem and N dep ; this is a by-product of the "V"-shaped Q * D function (Campo Bagatin et al 1994;Durda et al 1998;Davis et al 2002). Self-gravity among D > 200 m objects makes them increasingly difficult to disrupt.…”
Section: Initial Conditions and A Sample Coddem Runmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The t = 0 My timestep shows our initial conditions. The t = 3 My timestep shows a bump developing near D ∼ 2-3 km for both N rem and N dep ; this is a by-product of the "V"-shaped Q * D function (Campo Bagatin et al 1994;Durda et al 1998;Davis et al 2002). Self-gravity among D > 200 m objects makes them increasingly difficult to disrupt.…”
Section: Initial Conditions and A Sample Coddem Runmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 (Durda et al 1998;Bottke et al 2004a,b). The size distribution that provided the best fit for N rem followed the observed main belt for D > 200 km bodies, an incremental power law index of -4.5 for 110 < D < 200 km bodies, and an incremental power law index of -1.2 for D < 110 km bodies (Bottke et al 2004b).…”
Section: Initial Conditions and A Sample Coddem Runmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For small objects, Q D is determined solely by the material strength, while for objects larger than ∼100 m, the gravitational binding energy dominates. As a result, Q D is commonly described by the sum of two power laws (see, e.g., Davis et al 1985;Holsapple 1994;Paolicchi et al 1996;Durda & Dermott 1997;Durda et al 1998;Benz & Asphaug 1999;Kenyon & Bromley 2004b) , and P-R time (short-dashed). The collisional time is an average over the grain orbits with all possible pericentric distances q and eccentricities e, weighted with the amounts of those particles in the disk.…”
Section: Dynamical and Collisional Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the most sophisticated sizefrequency distribution models (e.g., Durda et al, 1998) are correct, Bottke et al (2000) found that the flux of meteorite-sized ejecta produced by the largest asteroids (with the largest collisional cross sections) should dominate the flux produced by the smaller asteroids (which lose nearly all their ejecta due to low escape velocities). Hence, many of the chondrites and HEDs falling on Earth today may ultimately be derived from a few large source objects (e.g., 4 Vesta and 6 Hebe), despite that fact that nearly all mainbelt asteroids can potentially provide meteorite samples to Earth.…”
Section: Asteroids To Earth: the Dynamic Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%