1967
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.161.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision Spectroscopy. I. Analysis of the Scattering ofHe+by Ne and Ar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12, 13, and 20, plotted accordingly to this scaling procedure. We also show the same quantities as calculated by Smith et al 13 …”
Section: Numerical Results-comparison With Experimental Test Cassupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12, 13, and 20, plotted accordingly to this scaling procedure. We also show the same quantities as calculated by Smith et al 13 …”
Section: Numerical Results-comparison With Experimental Test Cassupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Using Eq. (10) to represent the interaction between a point positive charge and an atom (or spherically-symmetric approximation to a molecule) and applying Poisson's equation to this potential, we find the charge distribution to be (13) whereA=2N/H, B=2N(1-H-1 ), C=(H+1)/d, D=1/d, and l5(r) is the Dirac delta function which represents the point charge of the nucleus.…”
Section: B Interaction Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure yields relative numbers for ai()~) which still depend on the detection efficiency Sp whose energy dependence is not well known. In order to normalize cross sections obtained at different energies we make use of the fact that for small values of the reduced angle ~=ZEcM the reduced cross section p,=o-t(Z)-g.sinz is dominated by elastic scattering and therefore should only depend on z according to the scaling principle of Smith et al [17]. We norma- A comparison with their data in form of a plot p(z) versus z is not useful since at near-threshold energies p is certainly not only depending on v.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation of this laboratory differential cross section O-LA B to the center of mass system is straightforward. A reduced differential cross section [9], p= OcM sin OCMO-CM , obtained in this way is shown in Fig. 9.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%