2021
DOI: 10.3390/app112311336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision-Free Motion Planning of a Six-Link Manipulator Used in a Citrus Picking Robot

Abstract: This paper presents the results of a motion planning algorithm that has been used in an intelligent citrus-picking robot consisting of a six-link manipulator. The real-time performance of a motion planning algorithm is urgently required by the picking robot. Within the artificial potential field (APF) method, the motion planning of the picking manipulator was basically solved. However, the real-time requirement of the picking robot had not been totally satisfied by APF because of some native defects, such as t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential field functions are also employed for collision avoidance during the motion planning of non-holonomic mobile robots in a cluttered environment [24]. Tang et al [25] proposed an improved mathematical model of the APF (artificial potential field) method for the motion planning algorithm of citrus-picking robots. While the potential field principle is attractive due to its elegance and simplicity, however, it has significant problems of trapping at local minima, no passage between closely spaced obstacles, causing unstable motion in the presence of obstacles, and oscillations in narrow passages [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential field functions are also employed for collision avoidance during the motion planning of non-holonomic mobile robots in a cluttered environment [24]. Tang et al [25] proposed an improved mathematical model of the APF (artificial potential field) method for the motion planning algorithm of citrus-picking robots. While the potential field principle is attractive due to its elegance and simplicity, however, it has significant problems of trapping at local minima, no passage between closely spaced obstacles, causing unstable motion in the presence of obstacles, and oscillations in narrow passages [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve these problems of the traditional APF method, many modified APF methods are proposed, such as Xu et al [32] proposed that when the robot falls into the local minimum, the robot was set to move along the direction of the potential surface of repulsive potential energy, so as to make the robot break away from the local minimum. Tang et al [33] modified the potential field and force model of the APF method, reduced the amount of calculation of the algorithm, and avoided the problems of target unreachable and local minimum trap. Compared with the traditional APF method, the modified APF reduced the operation time by 54.89% and the total joint error by 45.41%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third is the exact method, mainly consisting of the exhaustive method and the dynamic planning method. When performing a picking task, the algorithm used to solve the fruit-picking sequence problem and find the shortest path is the TSP [8][9][10][11][12][13]. The second is in the joint space of the robot, arming each joint as a motor unit, with the power or torque calculated using the best pose [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%