2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2016.12.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision avoidance ZEM/ZEV optimal feedback guidance for powered descent phase of landing on Mars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 4. For the system (30), the proposed guidance (25) can ensure the terminal position of the lander to land within a neighborhood area of the target landing site in a fixed time, and the neighborhood and the upper bound of the convergence time are expressed in (31) and (32).…”
Section: Robustness Analysis Based On Practical Fixed-time Stabilimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 4. For the system (30), the proposed guidance (25) can ensure the terminal position of the lander to land within a neighborhood area of the target landing site in a fixed time, and the neighborhood and the upper bound of the convergence time are expressed in (31) and (32).…”
Section: Robustness Analysis Based On Practical Fixed-time Stabilimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo et al proposed a zero-effort-miss/zero-effort-velocity (ZEM/ZEV) optimal feedback guidance for Mars powered descent phase, which ensured the fuel optimality [12]. Yao et al proposed an improved ZEM/ZEV guidance by adding a collision avoidance term, which was proven effective to cope with the hazard avoidance problem [25]. Guo et al designed a waypoint method based ZEM/ZEV guidance to simplify the optimal solution during the landing process [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the dynamics are generally on a smaller order of magnitude and are uncertain and unknown in advance, the dynamic constraints (10)(11)(12) in the off-line design do not include these uncertain and unknown items.…”
Section: B Trajectory Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main concern of the optimal feedback guidance algorithms is always the guidance performance optimization under uncertain perturbations, but this kind of approaches usually doesn't consider retargeting [9]. To combine hazard avoidance with fuel sub-optimality, Zhang proposed a hybrid guidance algorithm for Mars powered descent using ZEM/ZEV and optimal feedback [10]. In summary, these existing methods for planetary powered descent still have design limitations when combining fuel optimality with retargeting flexibility and robustness against uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] Gradually, based on the Apollo method and its extension, a great deal of attention has been focused on the guidance problem using zero-effort-miss/zero-effort-velocity theory, optimal nonlinear feedback guidance algorithm, and sliding mode guidance approach during Mars landing process. [13][14][15][16][17] Nevertheless, most studies ignore the effect of disturbances or just regard the disturbance as a norm bounded vector. Abandoning the prior information or not using measurable signals will bring great conservativeness to the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%