2017
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2017.2714898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision Avoidance Strategies for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Formation Flight

Abstract: Collision avoidance strategies for multiple UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) based on geometry are investigated in this study. The proposed strategies allow a group of UAVs to avoid obstacles and separate if necessary through a simple algorithm with low computation by expanding the collision-cone approach to formation of UAVs. The geometric approach uses line-of-sight vectors and relative velocity vectors where dynamic constraints are included in the formation.Each UAV can determine which plane and direction ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
12

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
45
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the actions the UAV uses to avoid collision include both heading angle change and velocity change. The work in [34] investigated strategies for multiple UAVs to avoid collision with moving obstacles, which is a little similar with collision with enemy UAV. However, their work assumes all UAVs and all obstacles have constant ground speeds, and the direction of the velocity vector of an obstacle is constant.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the actions the UAV uses to avoid collision include both heading angle change and velocity change. The work in [34] investigated strategies for multiple UAVs to avoid collision with moving obstacles, which is a little similar with collision with enemy UAV. However, their work assumes all UAVs and all obstacles have constant ground speeds, and the direction of the velocity vector of an obstacle is constant.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European Commission's Directorate General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE), the European Defence Agency (EDA), the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), and the Single European Sky Air Traffic Management (ATM) Research (SESAR) Joint Undertaking (SJU) are also stepping up the efforts to safely accommodate UAS into the European aviation and ATM system [6]. In parallel with these government and industry-led initiatives, the aerospace research community has been continuously working on several challenges of integrating UAS into non-segregated airspaces including separation thresholds and methods for small UAS [7,8], UAS encounter modelling and collision avoidance [9][10][11], 3D obstacle avoidance strategies for UAS [12][13][14][15] dynamic model augmentation [16], Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) integrity augmentation for UAS [17], surveillance sensor integration in the UAS platform [18,19] and well-clear boundary models for UAS DAA [20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reviews have been completed on relevant issues in the past two years [5][6][7][8]. Popular collision avoidance algorithms include geometric method [9][10][11], sampling-based method [12][13][14], numerical optimization [15][16][17][18][19], and artificial potential field (APF) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The geometric method considers the geometric representation of the collision scene in the search for collision avoidance maneuvers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%