2016
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/2048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collimator optimization in myocardial perfusion SPECT using the ideal observer and realistic background variability for lesion detection and joint detection and localization tasks

Abstract: In SPECT imaging, collimators are a major factor limiting image quality and largely determine the noise and resolution of SPECT images. In this paper, we seek the collimator with the optimal tradeoff between image noise and resolution with respect to performance on two tasks related to myocardial perfusion SPECT: perfusion defect detection and joint detection and localization. We used the Ideal Observer (IO) operating on realistic background-known-statistically (BKS) and signal-known-exactly (SKE) data. The ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This realistic phantom includes parameterized models for anatomy, which allows the generation of a series of phantoms with different anatomical variations. These phantoms have been used in Nuclear Medicine imaging and CT research, 6–12 as well as in various applications of deep learning 13–15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This realistic phantom includes parameterized models for anatomy, which allows the generation of a series of phantoms with different anatomical variations. These phantoms have been used in Nuclear Medicine imaging and CT research, 6–12 as well as in various applications of deep learning 13–15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This realistic phantom includes parameterized models for anatomy, which allows the generation of a series of phantoms with different anatomical variations. These phantoms have been used in Nuclear Medicine imaging and CT research, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] as well as in various applications of deep learning. [13][14][15] In the XCAT phantom, changing the values of parameters that control organ anatomy can be used to vary the volumes and shapes of some tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, evaluation of these approaches should be based on the clinical task for which imaging was performed. Multiple methods have been developed to perform this task‐based assessment of image quality, 1–3 and the efficacy of this evaluation procedure has been demonstrated in multiple studies 4–10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple methods have been developed to perform this task-based assessment of image quality, [1][2][3] and the efficacy of this evaluation procedure has been demonstrated in multiple studies. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Currently, DL-based denoising methods for medical imaging are typically evaluated using figures of merit (FoMs) such as root mean squared error (RMSE) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). [11][12][13] These FoMs measure fidelity between the images obtained using DL-based denoising approaches as compared to some reference images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of images with known truth is needed to provide reliable estimates of these quantities (Fukunaga and Hayes, 1989a, Kupinski et al, 2007, Ge et al, 2014). Furthermore, in large optimization and evaluation studies, task performance is assessed for many different combinations of system parameters and methods, such as different collimator designs (Yihuan et al, 2014, Ghaly et al, 2016), reconstruction methods and parameters (Frey et al, 2002, Gilland et al, 2006, He et al, 2006), and post-reconstruction filters and processing techniques (Frey et al, 2002, Sankaran et al, 2002). Thus, ensemble techniques require an enormous number of images to be obtained and stored; which often limits the number of parameters that can be explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%