Quantitative Analysis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging 2006
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-25444-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collimator-Detector Response Compensation in SPECT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such one could conjecture that the NEQ, already enhanced by wider MTF due to better recovery of higher frequencies, will be further boosted, at higher frequencies, due to division by diminished NPS values. This was reported in a dissertation 110 in the case of collimator-detector response function (CDRF) compensation 111 in SPECT imaging, and recently 127 in the case of resolution modeling in PET: in fact complex NPS structures were observed, including increased mid-frequency components of the NPS and diminished high-frequency components, relative to no compensation, ultimately demonstrating limited NEQ improvements. Overall, the abovementioned framework, coupled with the complex nature of the NPS and thus NEQ, may hold a key to explaining why in the inclusion of resolution modeling, observer task performance may result in relatively less improvements compared to those observed in conventional resolution/contrast vs noise analysis.…”
Section: Aucmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As such one could conjecture that the NEQ, already enhanced by wider MTF due to better recovery of higher frequencies, will be further boosted, at higher frequencies, due to division by diminished NPS values. This was reported in a dissertation 110 in the case of collimator-detector response function (CDRF) compensation 111 in SPECT imaging, and recently 127 in the case of resolution modeling in PET: in fact complex NPS structures were observed, including increased mid-frequency components of the NPS and diminished high-frequency components, relative to no compensation, ultimately demonstrating limited NEQ improvements. Overall, the abovementioned framework, coupled with the complex nature of the NPS and thus NEQ, may hold a key to explaining why in the inclusion of resolution modeling, observer task performance may result in relatively less improvements compared to those observed in conventional resolution/contrast vs noise analysis.…”
Section: Aucmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The probability of a g-ray's having been emitted from coordinates (x, y, z) relative to the detector is modeled, creating a probability map used by the reconstruction algorithm. The characteristics of the collimator are included in the probability map estimation (16)(17)(18)(19)(20), but attenuation and scatter are not included.…”
Section: Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSF can be integrated into reconstruction as part of an iterative algorithm. The PSF has 4 components: septal penetration, septal scatter, intrinsic detector response, and, most important, geometric response function (GRF) (6). The GRF component is defined as the normalized 2-dimensional Fourier transform of the point-source image formed in a plane behind the collimator by photons that are accepted geometrically through the collimator holes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%