1998
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1998.83.2.627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

College Students' Perceptions of Helpful Responses to Bereaved Persons: Effects of Sex of Bereaved Persons and Cause of Death

Abstract: The present study examined whether the Sex of the participant, Cause of death (natural causes or suicide) and Sex of the bereaved were related to the perceived helpfulness of the behaviors and comments of support providers. After reading one of four scenarios in which a parent's cause of death and the sex of the grieving child were varied, 198 college students (112 women, 86 men) rated the helpfulness of 34 statements. Significant main effects for sex of the participant and cause of death were both found. Whil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research has found that grief management messages high in person centeredness are generally experienced as more helpful than those low in person centeredness (Rack et al, 2008; Servaty‐Seib & Burleson, 2007). There is, however, growing evidence that recipient responses to grief management efforts vary as a function of helper characteristics, situational factors, and recipient characteristics (Knight, Elfenbein, & Messina‐Soares, 1998; Pennebaker, Mayne, & Francis, 1997; Range, Kovac, & Marion, 2000; Range, Walston, & Pollard, 1992; Suitor & Pillemer, 2000; Zech, Rime, & Nils, 2004). Study 1 sought to address our hypotheses and research question by determining whether differences in processing grief management messages (indexed by the degree of discrimination in evaluations of LPC and HPC messages) could be explained in terms of factors related to processing ability and motivation (i.e., cognitive complexity, degree of emotional upset).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has found that grief management messages high in person centeredness are generally experienced as more helpful than those low in person centeredness (Rack et al, 2008; Servaty‐Seib & Burleson, 2007). There is, however, growing evidence that recipient responses to grief management efforts vary as a function of helper characteristics, situational factors, and recipient characteristics (Knight, Elfenbein, & Messina‐Soares, 1998; Pennebaker, Mayne, & Francis, 1997; Range, Kovac, & Marion, 2000; Range, Walston, & Pollard, 1992; Suitor & Pillemer, 2000; Zech, Rime, & Nils, 2004). Study 1 sought to address our hypotheses and research question by determining whether differences in processing grief management messages (indexed by the degree of discrimination in evaluations of LPC and HPC messages) could be explained in terms of factors related to processing ability and motivation (i.e., cognitive complexity, degree of emotional upset).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Neimeyer and Jordan (2002) explained, even when others are naturally swept along with us in our grief, still "facets of our individual experience will inevitably go unrecognized, unarticulated, and unvalued" (p. 95), especially when the loss is non-normative. This suggests that social interaction does not always equal social support (Knight, Elfenbein, & Messina-Soares, 1998); rather, as Fiore, Becker, and Coppel (1983) aptly stated, social interaction can engender stress as easily as it can support.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%