2020
DOI: 10.1080/15401383.2020.1757002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

College Student Mental Health in an Animal-Assisted Intervention Program: A Preliminary Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although providing this kind of intervention to college and university students is a fairly new undertaking [ 26 ], there is promising evidence that AAIs can, amongst others, result in higher ratings of momentary positive emotions, a reduction in stress-related negative emotions [ 27 , 28 ], psychological and physical markers of stress [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], anxiety [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], and homesickness while increasing their satisfaction with life, connectedness to campus [ 37 , 38 ], behavioral aspects of academic success [ 39 ], well-being and improving their social skills as well as their mood [ 29 , 33 , 40 ]. Furthermore, Daltry and Mehr [ 41 ] found that having animals on campus may promote the services offered by student counseling centers on campus, as a lot of students were unaware of them before implementing the AAI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although providing this kind of intervention to college and university students is a fairly new undertaking [ 26 ], there is promising evidence that AAIs can, amongst others, result in higher ratings of momentary positive emotions, a reduction in stress-related negative emotions [ 27 , 28 ], psychological and physical markers of stress [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], anxiety [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], and homesickness while increasing their satisfaction with life, connectedness to campus [ 37 , 38 ], behavioral aspects of academic success [ 39 ], well-being and improving their social skills as well as their mood [ 29 , 33 , 40 ]. Furthermore, Daltry and Mehr [ 41 ] found that having animals on campus may promote the services offered by student counseling centers on campus, as a lot of students were unaware of them before implementing the AAI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other specified tools are Observational Measurement of Engagement (modified) [31], Social Behaviour Observation Checklist [57,61], Behavioural Instrument for the Assessment of Dog Well-Being Before/During/After Therapy Sessions [69], OHAIRE coding system (Observation of Human-Animal Interaction for Research) [64,68], an evaluation form [29] and a checklist [37] of the interaction with the dog. Finally, interaction with the dog is also assessed using questionnaires and/or scales [30,33,34,39,40,42,[74][75][76][77], including namely the Animal-assisted Therapy Flow Sheet [33,34,40] and the Human-Animal Interaction Scale (HAIS) [75].…”
Section: Dai/dai Simulation Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the focus is on the patient (or participant) who interacts with the animal. Nevertheless, other studies (n = 12) consider the dog's perspective [28,30,35,44,[52][53][54]56,58,62,65,69] or both perspectives (animal-and human-initiated interactions) (n = 8) [43,46,48,50,56,58,66,75].…”
Section: Dai/dai Simulation Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polking et al [178] wrong study design Quinn et al [179] wrong study design Ralston et al [180] wrong study design Renne et al [181] wrong study design Robino et al [182] wrong study design…”
Section: References Of Excluded Studies From Full Manuscript Search Reason Excludedmentioning
confidence: 99%