Abstract:Background
College-related alcohol beliefs, or beliefs that drinking alcohol is central to the college experience, have been shown to robustly predict alcohol-related outcomes among college students. Given the strength of the associations, it is imperative to understand more proximal factors (i.e., closer in causal chain leading to alcohol-related outcomes) that can explain these associations.
Objectives
The current research examined alcohol protective behavioral strategies (PBS) as a potential mediator of t… Show more
“…Challenging these risky cognitions in prevention programs and wellness classes as well as introducing protective behavioral strategies (Bravo, Prince, & Pearson, 2017) can decrease alcohol consumption and drinking problems among college students of diverse backgrounds.…”
Undergraduate students who believe that alcohol plays a central role in college life are prone to drink more frequently, in larger quantity, and experience more drinking problems. The College Life Alcohol Salience Scale (CLASS) measures individuals' college-related alcohol beliefs, but has been used predominantly in Euro American and freshman student samples. Emerging research suggests mean differences in college alcohol beliefs by gender and years in college, and measurement nonequivalence across nations. It remained unclear whether the CLASS functioned the same way across segments of the U.S. college population, whether students across sociodemographic groups differed in their college alcohol beliefs, and the extent to which these beliefs predicted their drinking-related outcomes. This study included 1,148 undergraduates (Mage = 19.95; 65.0% women; 44.9%, 19.9%, 10.3%, and 16.7% Euro, Asian, African, and Latinx Americans, respectively). Most students lived on campus (69.9%) and were not affiliated with the Greek system (65.7%). Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses supported scalar invariance of the CLASS scores across gender, years in college, and campus residence. The scale data achieved metric invariance and partial scalar invariance for ethnicity and Greek membership status. Associations between college alcohol beliefs and alcohol consumption, and drinking problems, were equivalent across sociodemographic categories, but differences in latent mean scores were found across gender, ethnicity, and Greek affiliations. Clinical utility of the CLASS and implications for considering college alcohol beliefs as a risk factor for hazardous alcohol use are discussed.
“…Challenging these risky cognitions in prevention programs and wellness classes as well as introducing protective behavioral strategies (Bravo, Prince, & Pearson, 2017) can decrease alcohol consumption and drinking problems among college students of diverse backgrounds.…”
Undergraduate students who believe that alcohol plays a central role in college life are prone to drink more frequently, in larger quantity, and experience more drinking problems. The College Life Alcohol Salience Scale (CLASS) measures individuals' college-related alcohol beliefs, but has been used predominantly in Euro American and freshman student samples. Emerging research suggests mean differences in college alcohol beliefs by gender and years in college, and measurement nonequivalence across nations. It remained unclear whether the CLASS functioned the same way across segments of the U.S. college population, whether students across sociodemographic groups differed in their college alcohol beliefs, and the extent to which these beliefs predicted their drinking-related outcomes. This study included 1,148 undergraduates (Mage = 19.95; 65.0% women; 44.9%, 19.9%, 10.3%, and 16.7% Euro, Asian, African, and Latinx Americans, respectively). Most students lived on campus (69.9%) and were not affiliated with the Greek system (65.7%). Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses supported scalar invariance of the CLASS scores across gender, years in college, and campus residence. The scale data achieved metric invariance and partial scalar invariance for ethnicity and Greek membership status. Associations between college alcohol beliefs and alcohol consumption, and drinking problems, were equivalent across sociodemographic categories, but differences in latent mean scores were found across gender, ethnicity, and Greek affiliations. Clinical utility of the CLASS and implications for considering college alcohol beliefs as a risk factor for hazardous alcohol use are discussed.
“…For example, using the CLASS, researchers have found that men endorse higher college alcohol beliefs compared to women (Bravo et al, 2017;Hustad et al, 2014;Pearson and Hustad, 2014). To date, it is unclear whether these findings regarding sex and college perceptions reflect actual differences in the degree to which men and women hold these perceptions, or whether they instead reflect measurement bias in the measure itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Participants were college students recruited from four universities across three countries to participate in an online survey regarding personal mental health, personality traits, and alcohol use behaviors (see Bravo, Pearson et al, 2017 for more information on recruitment procedures).…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, Osberg and colleagues developed and validated the College Life Alcohol Salience Scale (CLASS) to assess the internalization of college student drinking culture, or beliefs regarding the degree to which alcohol use is considered an integral part of the college experience. Since its development, the CLASS has been shown to be robustly associated with elevated levels of alcohol use and consequences among college students (Bravo et al, 2017;Osberg et al, 2010Osberg et al, , 2011Osberg et al, , 2012. Moreover, the CLASS has been shown to have stronger associations with negative alcohol-related consequences than many other established predictors of alcohol outcomes (e.g., descriptive norms, injunctive norms, alcohol expectancies; Hustad et al, 2014;Osberg and Boyer, 2016;Pearson and Hustad, 2014;Ward et al, 2015).…”
Objective: Perceptions about what is "normal" drinking in college, measured by the College Life Alcohol Salience Scale (CLASS; 15 items), have been robustly associated with elevated levels of problematic alcohol use, yet the role of these beliefs has not been studied outside the U.S. The present work examined measurement invariance of the CLASS across sex, drinker status, and in individuals of three different countries (i.e., U.S., Argentina, and Spain).Additional goals were to evaluate differences on the CLASS (i.e., latent mean differences) as a function of sex, drinker status and country and to compare construct validity (i.e., correlations with alcohol variables) across sex and different countries. Method: A large sample of 1,841 college students enrolled in universities from U.S., Spain and Argentina completed, via an online survey, a battery of instruments that assess college alcohol beliefs, drinking motives, alcohol consumption and alcohol-related negative consequences. Results: We found that a shortened 12-item version of the CLASS to be invariant across sex and drinker status, but only metric was found across countries. As expected, men and drinkers showed significantly higher scores on the CLASS than women and non-drinkers, respectively. Bivariate correlations between CLASS scores and drinking outcomes strongly supported criterion-related validity of this measure across multiple countries and sex with differing strengths in relationships with alcohol-related constructs. Conclusions: Taken together, perceptions of the centrality of alcohol to the college experience appear to be an important target for college student alcohol interventions across various cultures and countries, especially for male college student drinkers.
“…These strategies are classified into three subtypes: serious harm reduction (PBS-SHR; using a designated driver), stopping/limiting drinking (PBS-SLD; leaving the bar/party at a predetermined time), and manner of drinking (PBS-MOD; drink slowly versus chugging or gulping). Generally, evidence supports the protective value of PBS (Pearson, 2013); however, different effects can be found when PBS are dismantled into their subtypes (Bravo, Prince, & Pearson, 2017). It appears that PBS-SLD and PBS-MOD tend to vary in their negative association with alcohol consumption while PBS-SHR tends to be linked with decreases in ARNC (Napper, Kenney, Lac, Lewis, & LaBrie, 2014;Pearson, 2013).…”
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the moderating role of alcoholprotective behavioral strategy (PBS) types (stopping/limiting drinking-SLD; manner of drinking-MOD; serious harm reduction-SHR) on the relationships adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism have with alcohol misuse and alcohol-related negative consequences. Participants included 526 traditional-aged college students (Mage = 19.77, 80.7% female, 60.2% Caucasian/White non-Hispanic) who reported alcohol consumption in the past thirty days and completed measures of perfectionism, typical weekly drinking, alcohol-related negative consequences, and PBS use. PBS-SHR moderated the relationships between adaptive perfectionism and typical weekly drinking such that the negative association between adaptive perfectionism and typical weekly drinking was strongest for those reporting more PBS-SHR use. Additionally, PBS-SHR moderated the relationship between adaptive perfectionism and alcohol-related negative consequences such that the negative association between adaptive perfectionism and ARNC was weakened for those using more PBS-SHR. These results suggest the protective value of adaptive perfectionism and PBS-SHR for college students who tend to engage in frequent alcohol consumption. Therefore, alcohol prevention and intervention efforts may consider targeting personality variables, such as perfectionism, in relation to alcohol use behaviors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.