2021
DOI: 10.1002/onco.13707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

College of American Pathologists Tumor Regression Grading System for Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Abstract: Background The National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Rectal Cancer Guideline Panel recommends American Joint Committee of Cancer and College of American Pathologists (AJCC/CAP) tumor regression grading (TRG) system to evaluate pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Yet, the clinical significance of the AJCC/CAP TRG system has not been fully defined. Materials and Methods This was a multicenter, retrospectively recruited, and prospectively maintained co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cancer cells are usually graded based on degree of their differentiation [27][28][29]. The cells that are well organized and apparently similar to the normal cells are defined as low-grade (well-differentiated) cells, whereas those with disorganization are defined as high-grade (poor-differentiated or undifferentiated) cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cancer cells are usually graded based on degree of their differentiation [27][28][29]. The cells that are well organized and apparently similar to the normal cells are defined as low-grade (well-differentiated) cells, whereas those with disorganization are defined as high-grade (poor-differentiated or undifferentiated) cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cells that are well organized and apparently similar to the normal cells are defined as low-grade (well-differentiated) cells, whereas those with disorganization are defined as high-grade (poor-differentiated or undifferentiated) cells. In addition, the poor-differentiated grade is associated with the aggressive behaviors of cancer cells [27][28][29]. Aggressiveness of the cancer cells is characterized by chemoresistance toward various chemotherapy agents, increased cell proliferation, migration, invasion, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important studies have demonstrated the relevance of pCR, as an outcome that must be achieved in NCRT, as it is associated with good DFS and 5-year OS [ 11 , 40 ]. For patients with pCR, especially for tumors of the distal rectum, the WW strategy is quite attractive and safe [ 10 , 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, when verifying the prognostic value of the histological response, considerable work should be done on determining an optimal tumor response classification for GC. Currently, two major principles are common to these systems for grading tumor regression: (1) estimating residual tumor in relation to fibrotic changes, e.g., the Mandard, AJCC/CAP, and Dworak systems[ 17 , 18 , 30 ]; and (2) proportioning the residual tumor in relation to the previous tumor site, e.g., the Becker and JGCA system[ 16 , 31 ]. Although both are semiquantitative principles, the use of different systems reveals great regional disparities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of regressive tumors was evaluated and recorded according to: (1) The amount of viable tumor vs fibrotic tissue, which ranged from a total lack of tumor regression to complete response with no viable tumor identified; and (2) The percentage of the viable residual tumor, which was calculated by dividing the viable residual tumor area by the total tumor area. Tumor regression grades were then allocated according to the JGCA2017, JGCA, Becker, AJCC/CAP, and Mandard systems (Table 1 )[ 7 , 8 , 16 - 18 ]. As for the tumor regression grade, the JGCA2017 criteria example for each grade is shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%