Collective Well-Being to Improve Population Health Outcomes: An Actionable Conceptual Model and Review of the Literature

Roy, Brita; Riley, Carley; Sears, Lindsay E.; Rula, Elizabeth Y.

doi:10.1177/0890117118791993

Cited by 44 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 169 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is aligned with other person-centered models that describe multiple domains of determinants of health and well-being. [43][44][45] No single resource is sufficient to maintain high quality of life, and individuals benefit from access to high quality resources in all four SQ conditions. As such, outcomes-driven policies that support multi-level, multi-sector change are more likely to foster high QOL among residents.…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

An international comparison of factors affecting quality of life among patients with congestive heart failure: A cross-sectional study

Roy

Wolf²,

Carlson

et al. 2020

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To explore associations among twenty formal and informal, societal and individual-level factors and quality of life (QOL) among people living with congestive heart failure (CHF) in two settings with different healthcare and social care systems and sociocultural contexts. Setting and participants We recruited 367 adult patients with CHF from a single heart failure clinic within two countries with different national social to healthcare spending ratios: Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States (US), and Nijmegen, Netherlands (NL).

show abstract

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

An international comparison of factors affecting quality of life among patients with congestive heart failure: A cross-sectional study

Roy

Wolf²,

Carlson

et al. 2020

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We performed a Kaplan–Meier analysis to examine the difference in survival between groups that were high and low in self-acceptance and interdependence. Consistent with previous studies and recommendations [ 1 ], individuals above median self-acceptance scores were categorized as high, while the rest were grouped as low. Participants high in self-acceptance had a survival benefit of 3 years relative to those with low self-acceptance (log-rank test: χ 2 = 8.58, p = 0.003) at the 90th percentile (see Figure 1 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 64%

“…We used the mean scores for each component in our analyses. To enable Kaplan–Meier analyses, we created dichotomous versions through a median split [ 1 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Self-Acceptance and Interdependence Promote Longevity: Evidence From a 20-year Prospective Cohort Study

Allore

Levy

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We explored psychosocial pathways to longevity, specifically, the association between psychological well-being and mortality in a 20-year prospective cohort study of 7626 participants. As hypothesized, high self-acceptance and interdependence were associated with decreased mortality risk, controlling for other psychological components (purpose, positive relations, growth, mastery) and potential confounders: personality, depression, self-rated health, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), illness, and demographics. Self-acceptance decreased mortality risk by 19% and added three years of life. Longevity expectation fully mediated the relationship between self-acceptance and mortality. Interdependence decreased mortality risk by 17% and added two years of life. Serenity towards death fully mediated the relationship between interdependence and mortality. This is the first known study to investigate self-acceptance, interdependence, and serenity toward death as promoters of longevity, and distilled the relative contributions of these factors, controlling for covariates—all of which were measured over multiple time points. Theoretically, this study suggests that components of well-being may make meaningful contributions to longevity, and practically recommend that self-acceptance and interdependence could be added to interventions to promote aging health.

show abstract

“…This mattered to local communities, health care systems, and payers because it was easy to see improvements or setbacks in the percentage of people suffering (on average, the top 3.2% of the population at highest risk), struggling (medium/rising risk for 39.5% of the population), and thriving (57.3% of the population) 17 . These categories correlated with morbidity, mortality, cost, and worker productivity in a way that was important for driving meaningful improvement in health, well‐being, and societal outcomes 18,19 . Cantril's ladder was also an international standard, one of two measures recommended by the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) to measure population health and well‐being 20…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Well‐Being in the Nation: A Living Library of Measures to Drive Multi‐Sector Population Health Improvement and Address Social Determinants

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Well‐being In the Nation (WIN) offers the first parsimonious set of vetted common measures to improve population health and social determinants across sectors at local, state, and national levels and is driven by what communities need to improve health, well‐being, and equity. The WIN measures were codesigned with more than 100 communities, federal agencies, and national organizations across sectors, in alignment with the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, the Foundations for Evidence‐Based Policymaking Act, and Healthy People 2030. WIN offers a process for a collaborative learning measurement system to drive a learning health and well‐being system across sectors at the community, state, and national levels. The WIN development process identified critical gaps and opportunities in equitable community‐level data infrastructure, interoperability, and protections that could be used to inform the Federal Data Strategy.

show abstract

Collective Well-Being to Improve Population Health Outcomes: An Actionable Conceptual Model and Review of the Literature

Cited by 44 publications

References 169 publications

An international comparison of factors affecting quality of life among patients with congestive heart failure: A cross-sectional study

An international comparison of factors affecting quality of life among patients with congestive heart failure: A cross-sectional study

Self-Acceptance and Interdependence Promote Longevity: Evidence From a 20-year Prospective Cohort Study

Well‐Being in the Nation: A Living Library of Measures to Drive Multi‐Sector Population Health Improvement and Address Social Determinants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About