2019
DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2019.1676739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective victimhood of individual survivors: reflecting the uses and impacts of two academic narratives two decades after the war-rapes in Bosnia-Herzegovina

Abstract: The author argues that engaging with the legacy of war rapes that happened two decades ago allow us to observe, reflect and analyse the impact of past research, and in doing so to revise methodologies and theoretical approaches in the future research projects in the field. To reflect on the use of the pas knowledge production in her own ethnographic work, she reflects on two most persuasive academic narratives in the context of war-inflicted rapes in Bosnia-Herzegovina: (1) the victim-survivor name argument an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such discourse further maintains the focus on a particular aspect of the women’s identities (thus overlooking the many other PTEs that they experienced), limiting the space for them to be something other than ‘victims’ (a term that is used in BiH far more commonly than ‘survivors’) of sexual violence. In her own work in BiH, moreover, Močnik (2019) notes that: What continuously emerged in workshops and group conversations was the ‘totalizing narrative of victimization’ (Simić, 2012: 133): Over the years, survivors have learned that this narrative is powerful and beneficial in attracting and engaging with representatives of various media and institutions (e.g. academic, humanitarian, political, etc.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such discourse further maintains the focus on a particular aspect of the women’s identities (thus overlooking the many other PTEs that they experienced), limiting the space for them to be something other than ‘victims’ (a term that is used in BiH far more commonly than ‘survivors’) of sexual violence. In her own work in BiH, moreover, Močnik (2019) notes that: What continuously emerged in workshops and group conversations was the ‘totalizing narrative of victimization’ (Simić, 2012: 133): Over the years, survivors have learned that this narrative is powerful and beneficial in attracting and engaging with representatives of various media and institutions (e.g. academic, humanitarian, political, etc.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such discourse further maintains the focus on a particular aspect of the women's identities (thus overlooking the many other PTEs that they experienced), limiting the space for them to be something other than 'victims' (a term that is used in BiH far more commonly than 'survivors') of sexual violence. In her own work in BiH, moreover, Močnik (2019) notes that:…”
Section: Explaining Inter-country Differences In Ces Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…academic, humanitarian, political, etc.). 113 Notwithstanding the contextual differences between the three countries, which translated into variations in the resources that interviewees' social ecologies provided, common across the three datasets was the importance of children (and in some cases grandchildren) as a crucial protective and sustaining connectivity that motivated 'the everyday work of repair'. Children (often regardless of age) were a significant protective factor in the interviewees' lives, giving them a major reason to get on with living.…”
Section: An Empirical Analysis Of Resilience and Everyday Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That the community's perception of war is as collective trauma and a normal response to calamity, collective spaces may help to contain the trauma of individuals, where their distress is validated and incorporated at a collective level. Speaking about rape survivors in the former Yugoslavia, Močnik (2019) suggests creating spaces to listen and acknowledge the "broken silences" of the women, and Lentin (1999) writes about how these spaces should close the memory gap between the trauma of rape and its available expressions/discourses. According to Močnik, collective approaches are more functional in facilitating healing as they can acknowledge and incorporate the diversity of victimhood.…”
Section: Implications For Health Promotion and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double victimization and silencing is not unique to Tamil women who share many commonalities with women who suffered through what is termed as "the gendered wars" in countries such as Rwanda, Bosnia, Iraq, Algeria, and Kosovo (Lentin, 1999). Furthermore, the gender constructions and their influence in sanctioning expressions of distress in Tamil women is also observed in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission testimonies of South African women (Ross, 2003) and the narratives of Bosnian rape survivors (Močnik, 2019). Höglund (2019) comments on the gendered dimensions of the public Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) testimonies by Tamil women from the war-torn North and East of Sri Lanka.…”
Section: Manifestations Of Distressmentioning
confidence: 99%