1976
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-460816-0.50013-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Transport in Plasmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For sufficiently high density the suppression of electron thermal conduction should be classical, that is (l+co e^t e^)', not Bohm-like. [22] It does not appear to be necessary to magnetically confine the magnetized plasma by insuring demanding that co iii > 1; it is only necessary to have co gte > 1 • Typically, in a Z= 1 plasma the cOgTe ~ SOcOiTi, so that the electron thermal conductivity can be drastically reduced without magnetizing the ions. However, electrostatic forces within the plasma keep the electrons and ions together ensuring neutrality, and for densities in the interesting part of the MIF/MTF parameter space, magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) is a good approximation, so no matter the value of cOiTi, the field and plasma move together.…”
Section: Altering the Fusion Physicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For sufficiently high density the suppression of electron thermal conduction should be classical, that is (l+co e^t e^)', not Bohm-like. [22] It does not appear to be necessary to magnetically confine the magnetized plasma by insuring demanding that co iii > 1; it is only necessary to have co gte > 1 • Typically, in a Z= 1 plasma the cOgTe ~ SOcOiTi, so that the electron thermal conductivity can be drastically reduced without magnetizing the ions. However, electrostatic forces within the plasma keep the electrons and ions together ensuring neutrality, and for densities in the interesting part of the MIF/MTF parameter space, magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) is a good approximation, so no matter the value of cOiTi, the field and plasma move together.…”
Section: Altering the Fusion Physicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It consists of 1) creating of a warm plasma with a closed magnetic field strong enough to reduce electron thermal conduction, 2) operating at lower densities than IFE (but much higher than MFE) in order to reduce radiation losses, and 3) compressing the plasma and embedded field to fusion conditions. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Early experiments on wall confinement [28,29] and the IFE theory lead to early experiments, [23,24] but later proposed variants [31,32] are based on a field-reversed configuration with a guide field. 1-D & 2-D calculations [4,24,32,33] indicate that both approaches can provide adequate compression of the magnetized plasma, i.e., sufficient to initiate thermonuclear bum.…”
Section: Altering the Fusion Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detai. led description of the model is given in Dawson et al (1976). Our model retains the full dynamics for both electrons and ions, and so •the integration time step (At = 0.20•pe -1) is determined by the electron motion.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation is an important tool for plasma physics (Potter 1973;Dawson, Okuda & Rosen 1976;Hockney & Eastwood 1981;Dawson 1983;Birdsall & Langdon 1991). A structured mesh is easy to implement and widely used in PIC simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%