2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45246-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Profitability and Welfare in Selling-Buying Intermediation Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us now consider the following cycle of : (1, 3), (3, 6), (6,4), (4,1). Representing arcs by their indices and assigning one of signs + and − to each arc following its orientation relative to the cycle orientation, we get the cycle: 1, 5, −6, −2.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us now consider the following cycle of : (1, 3), (3, 6), (6,4), (4,1). Representing arcs by their indices and assigning one of signs + and − to each arc following its orientation relative to the cycle orientation, we get the cycle: 1, 5, −6, −2.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our recent research work we are interested in the modelling and analysis of such complex business processes as semi-competitive intermediation networks. Our results on this subject are presented in papers [4,5] and synthesis paper [12] and refer to the following aspects of the problem: i) the introduction of a domain-independent process model, grounded on Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG hereafter), and ii) the development of necessary and sufficient conditions that guarantee profitable pricing strategies of involved actors in the intermediation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%