1990
DOI: 10.1068/c080179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Order and Economic Coordination in Industrial Agglomerations: The Technopoles of Southern California

Abstract: We begin by remarking upon the pervasiveness of nonmarket institutional arrangements in capitalist economic systems. We then sketch out some typical generalized forms of collective order and economic coordination in industrial agglomerations—quasi-integration, voluntary associations, informal business cultures, and governmental institutions. With the aid of simple statistics we describe the growth of the high-technology industrial agglomerations (technopoles) of Southern California since the 1950s. The specifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the problem of local fiscal dependence, there is competition between local jurisdictions for fiscally productive land uses; this is a competition, moreover, that is intensified by the endemic political fragmentation of metropolitan areas. Occasionally, this does call for cooperative forms of economic governance at the regional level (Cox and Jonas 1993;Cox 1997; see Scott and Paul 1990).…”
Section: Property Externalities Resources and Land-use Conflict In mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given the problem of local fiscal dependence, there is competition between local jurisdictions for fiscally productive land uses; this is a competition, moreover, that is intensified by the endemic political fragmentation of metropolitan areas. Occasionally, this does call for cooperative forms of economic governance at the regional level (Cox and Jonas 1993;Cox 1997; see Scott and Paul 1990).…”
Section: Property Externalities Resources and Land-use Conflict In mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Leading suburban cities of Chinese-owned businesses, San Gabriel Valley, Los Angeles County, 1991 grated firms (Scott 1988, 174). Second, firms can take advantage of labor supply and provision of common business and social services, and in so doing save on external economies and improve flexibility in the labor market (Scott 1988;Scott and Paul 1990;Storper and Walker 1989;Walker 1988). Intensive use of interfirm networks in turn is associated with territorial agglomeration, mainly for three reasons: first, spatial proximity can substantially reduce the transaction costs among many smaller units.…”
Section: Interfirm Network and Territorial Agglomerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, such arguments are pervaded by a heavy dose of functionalism concerning the necessary link between post-Fordist accumulation strategies and territorial decentralisation. One alternative is that globalisation has simply encouraged a reciprocal process of political (3) Governance regionalisation has been demonstrated, in particular, with respect to innovation strategy and labour-market governance (Peck, 1996;Perulli, 1993;Scott and Paul, 1990). localisationöpolitical activism on a range of issues (for example, opposition to infrastructural developments, such as airports; workforce responses to plant closure, etc) is increasingly evident at, and yet often confined to, the local scale (Preteceille, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%