“…4 B). Residues 2,9,16,[23][24][25]28,29,39,48,52,53,61,62,74, and 75 also display diversity, albeit to a lesser extent, in the fluctuation direction of the second mode. These residues are also observed to lie along the rotational axes (Fig.…”
Section: Diversity In Orientational Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, elastic network models have gained considerable attention for studying the large-scale motion of protein structures that are relevant to function (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). This suggests that the structures evolved in such a way that the intrinsic elastic low-frequency modes are the most efficient way for the structures to function.…”
The structural fluctuations of HIV-1 protease in interaction with its substrates versus inhibitors were analyzed using the anisotropic network model. The directions of fluctuations in the most cooperative functional modes differ mainly around the dynamically key regions, i.e., the hinge axes, which appear to be more flexible in substrate complexes. The flexibility of HIV-1 protease is likely optimized for the substrates' turnover, resulting in substrate complexes being dynamic. In contrast, in an inhibitor complex, the inhibitor should bind and lock down to inactivate the active site. Protease and ligands are not independent. Substrates are also more flexible than inhibitors and have the potential to meet the dynamic distributions that are inherent in the protease. This may suggest a rationale and guidelines for designing inhibitors that can better fit the ensemble of binding sites that are dynamically accessible to the protease.
“…4 B). Residues 2,9,16,[23][24][25]28,29,39,48,52,53,61,62,74, and 75 also display diversity, albeit to a lesser extent, in the fluctuation direction of the second mode. These residues are also observed to lie along the rotational axes (Fig.…”
Section: Diversity In Orientational Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, elastic network models have gained considerable attention for studying the large-scale motion of protein structures that are relevant to function (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). This suggests that the structures evolved in such a way that the intrinsic elastic low-frequency modes are the most efficient way for the structures to function.…”
The structural fluctuations of HIV-1 protease in interaction with its substrates versus inhibitors were analyzed using the anisotropic network model. The directions of fluctuations in the most cooperative functional modes differ mainly around the dynamically key regions, i.e., the hinge axes, which appear to be more flexible in substrate complexes. The flexibility of HIV-1 protease is likely optimized for the substrates' turnover, resulting in substrate complexes being dynamic. In contrast, in an inhibitor complex, the inhibitor should bind and lock down to inactivate the active site. Protease and ligands are not independent. Substrates are also more flexible than inhibitors and have the potential to meet the dynamic distributions that are inherent in the protease. This may suggest a rationale and guidelines for designing inhibitors that can better fit the ensemble of binding sites that are dynamically accessible to the protease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.