2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2001.tb02037.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COLLECTIVE MOBILIZATION AND IDENTITY FROM THE UNDERGROUND: The Deployment of "Oppositional Capital" in the Harm Reduction Movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite their preliminary nature, the findings of this research support a number of policy and programme recommendations. Firstly, echoing others who have suggested that health and social service sites are a primary location for stigma remediation, this research suggests that it is crucial to not only educate the staff serving vulnerable groups about stigma in service environments, but also to invest in employee wellness strategies that take into consideration the vulnerability of front‐line workers, particularly those with limited education and workplace autonomy (Lee et al 2005, Link et al 2008, Wieloch 2002). In addition to educating and supporting workers in specific sites where stigmatised groups are served it is also crucial to take a collaborative, inter‐sectoral and coalitional approach to stigma, not only because such an approach is likely to have a greater impact on public awareness and public policy, but also because it helps both to overcome the tendency for essentialist discourse to emerge regarding stigmatised identities, and to address more effectively the complex interconnections among processes of social and economic marginalisation (Scambler 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Despite their preliminary nature, the findings of this research support a number of policy and programme recommendations. Firstly, echoing others who have suggested that health and social service sites are a primary location for stigma remediation, this research suggests that it is crucial to not only educate the staff serving vulnerable groups about stigma in service environments, but also to invest in employee wellness strategies that take into consideration the vulnerability of front‐line workers, particularly those with limited education and workplace autonomy (Lee et al 2005, Link et al 2008, Wieloch 2002). In addition to educating and supporting workers in specific sites where stigmatised groups are served it is also crucial to take a collaborative, inter‐sectoral and coalitional approach to stigma, not only because such an approach is likely to have a greater impact on public awareness and public policy, but also because it helps both to overcome the tendency for essentialist discourse to emerge regarding stigmatised identities, and to address more effectively the complex interconnections among processes of social and economic marginalisation (Scambler 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The primary focus is on the deeper social, economic and racial inequality that the 'drug problem' masks. From this point of view, harm reduction is ideological and oppositional (Herkt, 1993;Crofts & Herkt, 1995;Jose et al, 1996;Balian & White, 1998;Livingston, 1999;Wieloch, 2002). On the other hand, most public and preventive health bodies see 'risk' and 'harm' as having an objective, factual existence that affects identifiable individuals, groups or populations in definable ways.…”
Section: 'Mature' and Apolitical Harm Reductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Harm reduction certainly highlights this health-politics connection. It is an organized, if loose, coalition of individuals and organizations working both inside and beyond state institutions at local, national, and global scales to improve the health of people who use drugs, to make rights claims, and to change legal regulations, governance practices, and social attitudes toward users (Bluthenthal, 1998;Wieloch, 2002;VANDU, 2004VANDU, , 2010Friedman et al, 2007;Newcombe, 2007;Tempalski, 2007;Brown and Watson, 2009). …”
Section: Movements: Public Health Policy As Mobile Mutable and Politicalmentioning
confidence: 97%