2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective mechanical responses of cadherin-based adhesive junctions as predicted by simulations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 173 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These height images revealed that the average bottom height of GUV-2 and GUV-3 above the surface is approximately 35 nm, while GUV-1 exhibits a greater height of 56 nm. Factoring in the thickness of the SLBs (approximately 4 nm) and the hydration layer (about 2 nm) (32), the size of the Fc fragment (d Fc = 7 nm, as determined from the crystal structure) (34), and the tile angle of the E-cad in the clustered state (approximately 30°, determined from the crystal structure) (26, 29), we calculated that the EC5-EC5 distance for GUV-2 and GUV-3 is approximately 20 nm, whereas for GUV-1, it measures roughly 35 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These height images revealed that the average bottom height of GUV-2 and GUV-3 above the surface is approximately 35 nm, while GUV-1 exhibits a greater height of 56 nm. Factoring in the thickness of the SLBs (approximately 4 nm) and the hydration layer (about 2 nm) (32), the size of the Fc fragment (d Fc = 7 nm, as determined from the crystal structure) (34), and the tile angle of the E-cad in the clustered state (approximately 30°, determined from the crystal structure) (26, 29), we calculated that the EC5-EC5 distance for GUV-2 and GUV-3 is approximately 20 nm, whereas for GUV-1, it measures roughly 35 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%