1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.53.15493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective excitations in a single-layer carbon nanotube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5b) one can see that the E 11 exciton energy Ω 11 decreases by 145 meV/% while Ω 22 increases by 128 meV/%. Results for Ω 33 and Ω 44 (Table 1) give values of -157 meV/% and +75 meV/%, respectively. Thus, the qualitative trends observed from the GW calculations are maintained with the optical properties; however, because the quasiparticle bandgap and the exciton energy have a different dependence on strain, dE GW g /dσ = dΩ/dσ, one can deduce that the exciton binding energy E b = E GW g − Ω depends on strain.…”
Section: Impact Of Many-body Effects On Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5b) one can see that the E 11 exciton energy Ω 11 decreases by 145 meV/% while Ω 22 increases by 128 meV/%. Results for Ω 33 and Ω 44 (Table 1) give values of -157 meV/% and +75 meV/%, respectively. Thus, the qualitative trends observed from the GW calculations are maintained with the optical properties; however, because the quasiparticle bandgap and the exciton energy have a different dependence on strain, dE GW g /dσ = dΩ/dσ, one can deduce that the exciton binding energy E b = E GW g − Ω depends on strain.…”
Section: Impact Of Many-body Effects On Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…During the past years, the collective excitations have been widely studied with different theoretical models, such as the classical hydrodynamic model 1,2 and the quantum dielectric-response model with the random-phase approximation. [3][4][5] The studies correspond to high-frequency excitations which come from electron oscillations in carbon nanotubes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Usually single wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) shows two bulk plasmons (σ+π plasmon and π plasmon) and one surface plasmon near 20, 5 and 13 eV respectively. 8,9,10 Axial straining of the SWCNT shows a shift in the π plasmon frequency in case of perpendicular incidence of light. 6 The electric field localization near plasmon frequency increased to 10% when compared with parallel incidence of light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%