2014
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1401992111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective credit allocation in science

Abstract: Significance The increasing dominance of multiauthor papers is straining the credit system of science: although for single-author papers, the credit is obvious and undivided, for multiauthor papers, credit assignment varies from discipline to discipline. Consequently, each research field runs its own informal credit allocation system, which is hard to decode for outsiders. Here we develop a discipline-independent algorithm to decipher the collective credit allocation process within science, capturing… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
108
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
108
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We must consider variables such as authorship criteria, design, implementation and development, considering the contribution of each author to the final output (Allen, Brand, Scott, Altman, & Hlava, 2014;Shen & Barabasi, 2014). On the other hand, contexts such as participating institutions, area of expertise, and countries of the principal authors influence the impact of products as well (Guerrero Bote et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must consider variables such as authorship criteria, design, implementation and development, considering the contribution of each author to the final output (Allen, Brand, Scott, Altman, & Hlava, 2014;Shen & Barabasi, 2014). On the other hand, contexts such as participating institutions, area of expertise, and countries of the principal authors influence the impact of products as well (Guerrero Bote et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for diverse research approaches and transdisciplinary teams to address complex problems is increasingly recognized (39). However, a greater emphasis on "team science" will require a radical reconsideration of how scientists are organized, supported, and rewarded (40)(41)(42).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then calculate a credit sharing matrix A, whose element a Ii,h denotes the credit amount of I i institute from the h-th paper in D j . Assuming that I i is at the r-th position in the h-th paper with k institutes, iii) m Ii,j , the credit of institute I i is obtained from paper p j [29]:…”
Section: Credit Allocation Methods (Cam)mentioning
confidence: 99%