2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.04.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective clusterization effects in light heavy ion reactions

Abstract: The collective clusterization process, proposed for intermediate mass fragments (IMFs, 4$<$A$\le$28, 2$<$Z$\le$14) emitted from the hot and rotating compound nuclei formed in low energy reactions, is extended further to include also the emission of light particles (LPs, A$\le$4, Z$\le$2) from the fusion-evaporation residues. Both the LPs and IMFs are treated as the dynamical collective mass motion of preformed clusters through the barrier. Compared to IMFs, LPs are shown to have different characteristics, and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent attempt toward dynamically treating the decay of a hot and rotating nucleus has been made by Gupta and collaborators [19][20][21][22][23][24], who propose a dynamical collective clusterization process as a possible alternative of the fission process. Both the LPs and IMFs are considered as the dynamical mass motion of preformed fragments or clusters through the barrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent attempt toward dynamically treating the decay of a hot and rotating nucleus has been made by Gupta and collaborators [19][20][21][22][23][24], who propose a dynamical collective clusterization process as a possible alternative of the fission process. Both the LPs and IMFs are considered as the dynamical mass motion of preformed fragments or clusters through the barrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly enough, the light particles, though treated within the same dynamical collective clusterization process, are found to possess different characteristic properties. Brief reports of the present work have recently been presented elsewhere [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method of introducing the necklength parameter R is also used in our dynamical clusterdecay model (DCM) [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] and in the scission-point [39] and saddle-point [40,41] (statistical) fission models for decay of a hot and rotating compound nucleus.…”
Section: The Preformed Cluster Model (Pcm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground-state cluster decays of different parent nuclei in the trans-lead region have been observed by many experimental groups around the world, specifically, the clusters 14 C, 18,20 O, 23 F, 22,24,26 Ne, 28,30 Mg, 32 Si, and 34 Si, respectively, from 221−224,226 Ra, 226,228 Th, 231 Pa, 230,232,234 U, 236,238 Pu, 238 Pu, and 242 Cm parents [3,4]. Also, 14 C decay from 221 Fr and 225 Ac, and, more recently 14 C from 223 Ac and 34 Si from 238 U are observed [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Apparently, in the above stated formalisms, the emission of light particles (LPs) is calculated within the Hauser-Feshbach method [5]. Alternatively, in the dynamical cluster-decay model [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], one of us (R.K.G.) and collaborators treated both the LPs and IMFs on an equal footing as the dynamical collective mass motions of preformed clusters through the barrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%