2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective behavior learning by differentiating personal preference from peer influence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identitybased trust consists of emotional bonds between individuals. In trust relationships, people believe in the intrinsic virtue of such relationships and express genuine care and concern for the welfare of their partners (McAllister, 1995;Zhang et al, 2018). In such cases, people can develop strong inter-relationships and shared identities that will enable them to work together and create collective strengths.…”
Section: Identity-based Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identitybased trust consists of emotional bonds between individuals. In trust relationships, people believe in the intrinsic virtue of such relationships and express genuine care and concern for the welfare of their partners (McAllister, 1995;Zhang et al, 2018). In such cases, people can develop strong inter-relationships and shared identities that will enable them to work together and create collective strengths.…”
Section: Identity-based Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Zhang et al (2018), the influence of peers is influenced by the surrounding factors. The pinnacle of peer influence happens at fourteen years old during which the surrounding affects their life's actions.…”
Section: Peer Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of ML strategies and adaptation to cell motility investigation need the identification of the correct learning examples. Differently from other social contexts (10,11), none of the cells and related trajectories can be judged by experts, both because it cannot be practically done and because the heterogeneity of cell behavior and the massive number of cells make it impossible to extract the "truth" at sight. Because the acquired samples (cells) are not labeled by experts, cell trajectories would directly inherit the same label assigned to the entire experiment, i.e., cells moving in a control experiment would be assumed to behave in a unique, similar way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In in vitro experiments, cells naturally cluster before reaching the confluence; consensus strategies can be exploited to acquire a unique decision for the cluster. In this regard, we applied two distinct cooperative learning criteria, inspired by collective phenomena and peer influence studies (11); on the one hand, we applied a majority voting procedure to all the labels assigned by the classifier to the cell trajectories selected for that cluster; on the other, we summed up all the scores assigned to each category of the cells belonging to the same cluster and assigned the class with the largest total score to the cluster. We refer to the two criteria as majority voting criterion (maj-vot) and maximum trustiness criterion (max-trust).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%