2018
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ary158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective behavior and colony persistence of social spiders depends on their physical environment

Abstract: The physical environment occupied by group-living animals can profoundly affect their cooperative social interactions and therefore their collective behavior and success. These effects can be especially apparent in human-modified habitats, which often harbor substantial variation in the physical environments available within them. For nest-building animal societies, this influence of the physical environment on collective behavior can be mediated by the construction of nests-nests could either buffer animal be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the remaining colonies, aggressiveness was only measured once due to logistical constraints. Latency to attack prey and the number of spiders recruiting to an attack are a common measure of foraging aggressiveness in solitary and social spiders (Kralj‐Fiser & Schneider, ; Kralj‐Fiser et al., ; Pruitt, Grinsted, & Settepani, ; Riechert & Hedrick, ), and it tightly linked with prey capture success and foraging performance in several species of group‐living spiders (Kamath et al., ; Pinter‐Wollman, Mi, & Pruitt, ; Pruitt & Riechert, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the remaining colonies, aggressiveness was only measured once due to logistical constraints. Latency to attack prey and the number of spiders recruiting to an attack are a common measure of foraging aggressiveness in solitary and social spiders (Kralj‐Fiser & Schneider, ; Kralj‐Fiser et al., ; Pruitt, Grinsted, & Settepani, ; Riechert & Hedrick, ), and it tightly linked with prey capture success and foraging performance in several species of group‐living spiders (Kamath et al., ; Pinter‐Wollman, Mi, & Pruitt, ; Pruitt & Riechert, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could also contribute to the observed differences in prey capture rates across sites, because colonies at arid sites captured fewer prey. These effects are costly, as collective foraging aggressiveness is associated with colony mass gain and colony persistence in this system (Pinter-Wollman et al 2017, Kamath et al 2018a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the remaining colonies, aggressiveness was only measured once due to logistical constraints. Latency to attack prey is a common measure of foraging aggressiveness in solitary and social spiders (Riechert & Hedrick, 1993, Pruitt et al, 2013, Kralj-Fiser & Schneider, 2012, Kralj-Fiser et al, 2012), and it tightly linked with prey capture success and foraging performance in several species of group-living spiders (Kamath et al, 2018, Pinter-Wollman et al, 2017, Pruitt & Riechert, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%