2003
DOI: 10.1136/vr.153.12.365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collection of wild boar semen by electroejaculation

Abstract: Correspondence toProfessor Cisale THERE are few reports describing the electroejaculation of boars (Fraser 1971, Evans 1980, Evans and Ko 1990 or of related wild species (Gilmore and others 1998). Obtaining semen from boars using a dummy sow or even a sow in oestrus is not always feasible under field conditions, particularly when the subject is a mature, intractable boar (Fraser 1971). This is particularly true with wild boars. Nevertheless, it has been reported that the use ofelectroejaculation to collect boa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies aiming at identifying the seminal characteristics of wild boar are scarce (32,33). The values for sperm motility and viability were similar to those reported in these studies, but to our best knowledge, no studies have been conducted on chilling wild boar sperm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Studies aiming at identifying the seminal characteristics of wild boar are scarce (32,33). The values for sperm motility and viability were similar to those reported in these studies, but to our best knowledge, no studies have been conducted on chilling wild boar sperm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Environmental exposure is now recognized as an important route for human infection with E. coli O15740, an observation supported by case-control studies41,42,43 and spatial analysis9,10,11. Oral exposure to cattle faeces is significant, but more general environmental exposure is also likely as the bacteria are capable of long-term survival in manure, pasture and soil44.…”
Section: Carriage By Cattle and The Risk To Humansmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Já Souza et al (2009) A média de espermatozóides MPI encontrada foi de 55,4 ± 28,6%, valor menor que os relatados por Souza et al (2009), que encontraram variação de 74,3 ± 35 a 83,9 ± 7,0% em caititus. A integridade de membrana plasmática também foi menor que o índice de 93% observado por Evans e Ko (1990) em porcos miniatura, e dos relatados por Fischman et al (2003), que avaliaram observaram 84 ± 10% de células MPI em javalis. O pH médio seminal foi de 7,92 ± 0,73, diferentemente do relatado por Costa e Paula (2005), que observaram variações de 6,2 ± 0,2 a 7,6 ± 0,1, mas semelhante a Souza et al (2009), que verificaram pH entre 7,7 ± 0,5 a 8,1 ± 0,4 em caititus adultos.…”
Section: Características Seminaisunclassified