2018
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2018.1540859
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collection of soot particles into aqueous suspension using a particle-into-liquid sampler

Abstract: Steam collection devices collecting aerosol particles into liquid samples are frequently used to analyze water-soluble particulate material. The fate of water-insoluble components is often neglected. In this work, we show that fresh soot particles can be suspended into pure water using a steam collection device, the particle-into-liquid sampler (PILS, Weber et al. 2001). The overall collection efficiency of freshly generated soot particles was found to be on the order of 20%. This shows that, depending on the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The operating mechanism of PILS has been discussed extensively in the literature. 30–33 Briefly, the sample aerosol is mixed with saturated water vapor to grow the particles into larger droplets. Then, the droplets are impacted onto a vertical impactor surface, and the water-soluble species collected on the impactor are washed off with an aqueous solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The operating mechanism of PILS has been discussed extensively in the literature. 30–33 Briefly, the sample aerosol is mixed with saturated water vapor to grow the particles into larger droplets. Then, the droplets are impacted onto a vertical impactor surface, and the water-soluble species collected on the impactor are washed off with an aqueous solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operating mechanism of PILS has been discussed extensively in the literature. [30][31][32][33] Briey, the sample aerosol is mixed with saturated water vapor to grow the particles into larger droplets.…”
Section: Pils-esi-ms Analysis Of Reaction Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation relates to the performance of the PILS when sampling coarse and insoluble (or low-solubility) particles such as ash and/or crustal material associated with biomass burning. In the PILS, droplet growth and separation from the airstream as an aqueous solution are relatively well constrained for soluble material; however, Wonaschütz et al (2019) describe accumulation of insoluble material on the wicking material and impactor in association with laboratory experiments performed with soot particles, while Orsini et al (2003) also noted similar limitations for low-solubility calcium salts. We hypothesize that under constant rinsing, and particularly under varying environmental conditions, low-solubility crustal deposits may leach, or become detached, back into the PILS liquid stream in a process that is unlikely to be steady or controlled, perhaps explaining the intermittent structure.…”
Section: Boundary Layer Aerosolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the ambient mass fraction of EC was 34.3 μg/mg of PM which was similar to that of reaerosolized one (i.e., 31.0 μg/mg of PM). This shows that VACES/aerosol-into-liquid collector tandem is able to retrieve nearly 90% of ambient EC in collected PM slurries, which is a significant advantage over Particle-Into-Liquid Sampler (PILS), capturing 20% of soot particles (i.e., EC) into pure water (Wonaschuetz et al, 2018). Similar mass fractions were also observed between metal species (i.e., water-soluble and water-insoluble) for both set of samples, which will be discussed in further detail in the following section.…”
Section: Mass Balance For Bulk Chemical Components-figurementioning
confidence: 94%