1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6521(1999)3:2<95::aid-fact4>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collection of quantitative chemical release field data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These systems have been deployed in the field at pathlengths of hundreds of meters for CH 4 emission measurements from agricultural facilities (Childers et al 2001). Although OP/FTIR instruments are commonly calibrated in the field with calibration spectra or calibration cells, these techniques do not necessarily account for drift within the entire pathintegrated sampling volume (Demirgian and Macha 1999;Bacsik et al 2005). OP/FTIR calibration approaches have not been field tested to evaluate their capabilities for maintaining long-term measurement stability, especially in open-path systems with kilometer-scale pathlengths where sampling volume conditions may be rapidly changing (Demirgian and Macha 1999;Bacsik et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These systems have been deployed in the field at pathlengths of hundreds of meters for CH 4 emission measurements from agricultural facilities (Childers et al 2001). Although OP/FTIR instruments are commonly calibrated in the field with calibration spectra or calibration cells, these techniques do not necessarily account for drift within the entire pathintegrated sampling volume (Demirgian and Macha 1999;Bacsik et al 2005). OP/FTIR calibration approaches have not been field tested to evaluate their capabilities for maintaining long-term measurement stability, especially in open-path systems with kilometer-scale pathlengths where sampling volume conditions may be rapidly changing (Demirgian and Macha 1999;Bacsik et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although OP/FTIR instruments are commonly calibrated in the field with calibration spectra or calibration cells, these techniques do not necessarily account for drift within the entire pathintegrated sampling volume (Demirgian and Macha 1999;Bacsik et al 2005). OP/FTIR calibration approaches have not been field tested to evaluate their capabilities for maintaining long-term measurement stability, especially in open-path systems with kilometer-scale pathlengths where sampling volume conditions may be rapidly changing (Demirgian and Macha 1999;Bacsik et al 2005). Tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) CH 4 sensors with near-infrared sources have also been developed for laser scanning applications to detect natural gas leakage (Gibson et al 2006;Xia et al 2008) and to measure fugitive emission fluxes (Thoma et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%