1988
DOI: 10.1080/03079458808436440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collection and analysis of urine from racing pigeons (columba livia domestica)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In three of the published studies for doping control purposes, pigeon fecal matter was the chosen matrix 356–358 . Although previous studies have already demonstrated the ability to collect and isolate urine from feces, the required cloacal cannulation would be hardily feasible in a doping control context 360 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In three of the published studies for doping control purposes, pigeon fecal matter was the chosen matrix 356–358 . Although previous studies have already demonstrated the ability to collect and isolate urine from feces, the required cloacal cannulation would be hardily feasible in a doping control context 360 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[356][357][358] Although previous studies have already demonstrated the ability to collect and isolate urine from feces, the required cloacal cannulation would be hardily feasible in a doping control context. 360 More recently, feathers were considered suitable for the detection of budesonide, prednisolone, betamethasone, and clenbuterol in pigeons. 359 If correctly collected (restricting the collection to a few mature contour feathers), feathers are considered a minimally invasive biological matrix, not harming the animal.…”
Section: Pigeons (Columba Livia)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds, droppings consist of both feces and urine. Although the possibility of isolating urine from feces by cloacal cannulation was demonstrated [35], the method was not simple enough to be implemented in doping control. Furthermore, as for blood sampling, cloacal cannulation falls within the professionally recognized scope of veterinary practice and can only be performed by a licensed veterinarian.…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first was the 'cage method' whereby the animals were continuously observed and urine samples were collected by sucking up the urine part of the excreta from the trays at the bottom of the cage, within two minutes after excretion. The second method was the 'cloacal cannula method' (Halsema et al, 1987), a modification of the technique of Coulson and Hughes (1930).…”
Section: Design Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%