1977
DOI: 10.1016/0305-4403(77)90064-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collecting, sieving and archaeozoological research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most likely cause of this dissimilarity is the difference in the recovery techniques used in the two excavations. It is well known that sieving mitigates bias causing a low turnout of smaller animals (Payne 1972;Clason, Prummel 1977). Regardless of artificial differences in proportions, both assemblages demonstrate the important place of imported ovicaprid herds in domestic herd composition in D∫-I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most likely cause of this dissimilarity is the difference in the recovery techniques used in the two excavations. It is well known that sieving mitigates bias causing a low turnout of smaller animals (Payne 1972;Clason, Prummel 1977). Regardless of artificial differences in proportions, both assemblages demonstrate the important place of imported ovicaprid herds in domestic herd composition in D∫-I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown time and again that it is necessary to implement sieving in order to produce representative faunal samples (Thomas 1969;Casteel 1970;Payne 1972Payne , 1975Clason and Prummel 1977).…”
Section: Excavation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the species spectrum and the range of represented size classes are likely to have been strongly affected by this decision, particularly the fish. Several studies have shown that a more complete recovery of fish remains is only possible through the employment of dry and wet sieving techniques (Clason & Prummel, 1977;Rose, 1994, p. 388;, as has also been noted at Kinet. However, because much of the deposit was fill, the excavators decided not to sieve the matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%