2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268811001130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collecting close-contact social mixing data with contact diaries: reporting errors and biases

Abstract: SUMMARYThe analysis of contact networks plays a major role to understanding the dynamics of disease spread. Empirical contact data is often collected using contact diaries. Such studies rely on self-reported perceptions of contacts, and arrangements for validation are usually not made. Our study was based on a complete network study design that allowed for the analysis of reporting accuracy in contact diary studies. We collected contact data of the employees of three research groups over a period of 1 work wee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
119
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
13
119
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some shorter encounters may have been forgotten. [25] Some participants may have reported contacts for an atypical day, for instance they may have been sick during the assessment, but we were not able to make that distinction in our study. Our data were collected within a few months, and roughly during the same season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, some shorter encounters may have been forgotten. [25] Some participants may have reported contacts for an atypical day, for instance they may have been sick during the assessment, but we were not able to make that distinction in our study. Our data were collected within a few months, and roughly during the same season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…So far, no studies have validated the accuracy of contact diaries against other, more objective measures of social mixing; studies which have considered reciprocal agreement in the reporting of contact properties between participants found reciprocity increased with duration and intimacy of contact [15,29]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the study is dependent on participation and parents observing and recording contacts (and the age of contacts) there is likely to be participation and observation/recall bias, especially those with a lot of short contacts who might have failed to remember these or the age of contacts [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%