CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3491101.3519685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collecting and Reporting Race and Ethnicity Data in HCI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet empirical work in HCI-viewed across the field as a whole-is disparate; how we report is varied and sometimes spotty. This is certainly not a novel criticism; we echo calls from other researchers who are critically reflecting on our research reporting practices, e.g., with regards to the reporting of race and ethnicity data [14], brain signal experiment data [68], participant compensation data [65], inter-rater reliability in qualitative research [57], specific measures [71] and questionnaires [43,47], engagement with self-determination theory [81], artifact descriptions [33], and inferential statistics [12], to list just a few. These issues may arise in part due to page limits or efforts to ensure paper length matches perceived contribution, but may also be due to lack of community-driven standardization and education.…”
Section: Charting a New Trajectory: Critical Issues And Provocationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Yet empirical work in HCI-viewed across the field as a whole-is disparate; how we report is varied and sometimes spotty. This is certainly not a novel criticism; we echo calls from other researchers who are critically reflecting on our research reporting practices, e.g., with regards to the reporting of race and ethnicity data [14], brain signal experiment data [68], participant compensation data [65], inter-rater reliability in qualitative research [57], specific measures [71] and questionnaires [43,47], engagement with self-determination theory [81], artifact descriptions [33], and inferential statistics [12], to list just a few. These issues may arise in part due to page limits or efforts to ensure paper length matches perceived contribution, but may also be due to lack of community-driven standardization and education.…”
Section: Charting a New Trajectory: Critical Issues And Provocationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We must also consider the intersections when it comes to matters of social identity [11,26,37,40]. While work on social identities in HCI and adjacent spaces is growing-in populations [8,21,40] and in design materials, such as personas [26], creations [42], and underlying technologies [7]-we must go beyond analyzing multiple factors in isolation by considering how these factors intersect in ways that may be difficult or impossible to tease out. When it comes to kawaii, we may specifically expect a link between perceptions of younger age categories and femininity.…”
Section: Operationalizing Kawaii As a Sociocultural Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to ensure consistency and accuracy, it is recommended that we then code these identities to pre-existing categories or labels. By adopting these methods, IP effectively accounts for the nuances of race [19]. IP utilizes a matching process that pairs a crowdworker's racial background with a corresponding facial verification task.…”
Section: Ip's Human Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then coded these identities into the labels used by the RFW dataset, which included the labels: "Black or African American", "Asian", "Caucasian", and "Indian. " This approach is important in large-scale data collection efforts [27], and helps to effectively account for the nuances of race [19]. Additionally, we only selected crowdworkers who had no prior experience with facial verification tasks to control for confounding factors.…”
Section: Participants (Crowdworkers)mentioning
confidence: 99%