Colleagueship in the Making: Exploring Tensions of Social Ordering in Collegial Relations

Ryömä, Arto; Laiho, Maarit; Teerikangas, Satu

doi:10.5465/ambpp.2020.21418abstract

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Positioning and Problematisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In literature produced in an HE context, the focus tends to be on colleagueship as a form of collegiality: meaningful professional relationships with colleagues in pursuit of a range of professional goals (Arto et al, 2019). The notion of colleagueship has been developed in relation to shared leadership and critical reflexive dialogue and embodies six dimensions (Lord, 1994), of which productive disequilibrium, increasing teachers comfort with ambiguity and uncertainty and achieving collective generativity connect to the work of Hargreaves (1994Hargreaves ( , 1999 and Little (1990).…”

Section: Collegialitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Narrative encounters of pedagogic partnership, and the development of collegial capital in higher education

Mariaye

Price

Ramasawmy

et al. 2022

JPCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe study explores the relational encounters of five higher education tutors and programme leaders, working in collaboration across contrasting institutions: one, a modern, civic university in the Global North, and the other, a parastatal institution in the Global South. The purpose of the study is to deepen the understanding of evolving collegiality within a transnational partnership, stimulated by the COVID-19 pandemic related shift to online teaching and learning.Design/methodology/approachThe inquiry is informed conceptually by the concept of narrative encounter as a site of learning, with inductive, meta-analysis undertaken across our individual reflective narratives.FindingsThe narratives reveal three emergent themes: shared purpose, shared responsibility – through focus, routinised dialogue and concreteness; collective and individual risk-taking – through negotiated decision-making; and trust in self and in peers – through reciprocity, caring, duality and building on stable practices.Research limitations/implicationsThe data from which this paper is developed and its related central thesis of collegial capital are limited and partial. However, when agility within higher education partnerships is at a premium, this paper is a useful touchstone for further reflection.Originality/valueThe paper seeks to further the concept of collegiality and collegial capital, a dialogical affordance which enabled the partnership to build on previous collaborative successes.

show abstract

Section: Positioning and Problematisationmentioning

confidence: 99%