“…It is widely recognized that the dyadic relationships between supervisor and subordinate, such as leader–member exchange (LMX), is a critical antecedent of subordinates’ outcomes (Dulebohn, Bommer, Liden, Brouer, & Ferris, 2012; Mathieu, Fabi, Lacoursière, & Raymond, 2016). Given the paramount importance of guanxi in Chinese society, it should not be ignored when discussing Chinese supervisor–subordinate relationships (Chen, Chen, & Huang, 2013; Hong, Zhu, & White, 2013). As both LMX and supervisor–subordinate guanxi (SSG) capture the relationship between employee and supervisor, what distinguishes SSG, as scholars have argued, lies in the fact that LMX is built upon task activities through which work-related resources and affect are exchanged, while SSG represents connections that arise from social interactions beyond the work domain (e.g., Law, Wong, Wang, & Wang, 2000; Zhang, Li, & Harris, 2015).…”