Classical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning 1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-6310-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collateral Responses with Simple Schedules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that this reflects an interruption of operant responding by postprandial activities, such as licking in the vicinity of the dipper aperture (cf. Iversen, 1978;Staddon, 1977), which may be more prevalent following the consumption of the larger volume of the sucrose solution. Such an effect would have a more marked effect on response rate under high reinforcement frequencies, and might therefore result in a reduction in the value of Rmax.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that this reflects an interruption of operant responding by postprandial activities, such as licking in the vicinity of the dipper aperture (cf. Iversen, 1978;Staddon, 1977), which may be more prevalent following the consumption of the larger volume of the sucrose solution. Such an effect would have a more marked effect on response rate under high reinforcement frequencies, and might therefore result in a reduction in the value of Rmax.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2), may reflect an interruption of operant responding by postprandial activities such as licking in the vicinity of the dipper aperture (cf. Iversen, 1978;Staddon, 1977); such an effect would have a more marked influence on response rates under the higher reinforcement frequency. )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of each rat the line derived from the 3.2 ,umol/kg data has a greater slope than that derived from the 1.6 ,umol/kg data. Iversen, 1978;Staddon, 1977); such an effect would have a more marked influence on response rates under the higher reinforcement frequency. )…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%