2018
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collateral Constraints and the Law of One Price: An Experiment

Abstract: We test the asset pricing implications of collateralized borrowing (that is, of using assets as collateral to borrow money) in the laboratory. To this purpose, we develop a general equilibrium model with collateral constraints amenable to laboratory implementation and gather experimental data. In the laboratory, assets that can be leveraged fetch higher prices than assets that cannot, even though assets' payoffs are identical in all states of the world. Collateral value, therefore, creates deviations from the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aqeel Akhtar, Fahad Ahmed Qureshi, Mubeen Butt In this scenario, the one who owned greater part of the asset will be lender and the shorter will be borrower (Punzi & Rabitsch, 2018). It is permissible because to collateralize an un-owned property with the consent of actual owner is allowed (Cipriani, Fostel, & Houser, 2018). Moreover, the debts against which collateral is going to be kept in the custody of lender by both parties are of different in nature, genre and classification or not (Ahiadorme et al, 2018).…”
Section: Contractual Parties Of Rahnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aqeel Akhtar, Fahad Ahmed Qureshi, Mubeen Butt In this scenario, the one who owned greater part of the asset will be lender and the shorter will be borrower (Punzi & Rabitsch, 2018). It is permissible because to collateralize an un-owned property with the consent of actual owner is allowed (Cipriani, Fostel, & Houser, 2018). Moreover, the debts against which collateral is going to be kept in the custody of lender by both parties are of different in nature, genre and classification or not (Ahiadorme et al, 2018).…”
Section: Contractual Parties Of Rahnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LOP principle not only provides the foundations of many theoretical models (such as Black and Scholes (1973)), but also the justification of investment strategies used in markets. 1 Violations of LOP are often observed, but there are different interpretations in the literature: one approach suggests that non-fundamental factors such as noise and sentiment (Lamont and Thaler (2003a)) are the causes for LOP violations, while another approach views price discrepancies as the result of structural differences in dimensions like liquidity or pledgeability (see for instance Garleanu and Pedersen (2011), Cipriani et al (2018), and also the literature on the "on-the-run" premium that we discuss below). To better understand the nature of LOP violations, it is useful to analyze how they are affected by changes in market regulations and policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Recently, Cipriani et al (2012 and2018) have studied the asset-pricing implication of collateralized borrowing in a laboratory financial market: as predicted by the theoretical literature (see, for instance, Geanakoplos, 2008 andZame, 2014), leverage is priced and creates deviations from the Law of One Price. In contrast to our paper, in Cipriani et al (2012 and2018), leverage is exogenously set by the experimenter, there is only one type of collateral, and, by construction, default never occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the the marginal utility of money for Sellers at time 0 is given by µ S = 1, because in equilibrium they only hold riskless assets.2 Incidentally, as shown by Geanakoplos (2008, 2014) the liquidity value of the active contract in equilibrium equals the collateral value of the asset, LV B j=100 = CV B Y = 68.75. SeeCipriani et al (2018) for a study on the presence of collateral values in the lab.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%