2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2016.7487648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collar Line Segments for fast odometry estimation from Velodyne point clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using Velodyne LiDAR data, the authors achieved ±20 cm accuracy in the registration of pairwise scans. In our evaluation [10] using KITTI dataset [3], the method yields average error 11.5cm in the frameto-frame registration task. The robustness of GICP drops in case of large distance between the scans (> 6m).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using Velodyne LiDAR data, the authors achieved ±20 cm accuracy in the registration of pairwise scans. In our evaluation [10] using KITTI dataset [3], the method yields average error 11.5cm in the frameto-frame registration task. The robustness of GICP drops in case of large distance between the scans (> 6m).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser-based odometry and mapping systems often reduce the 3D point cloud data by relying on features [34], subsampled clouds [16,30], or voxelbased [34] as well as NDT-based map representations [27,23,4]. In contrast to that, we operate on all laser points and perform a registration to a surfel map at every step of the algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these approaches use (semi-)dense reconstructions of the environment and exploit them for frameto-model tracking, either by jointly optimizing the map and pose estimates or by alternating pose estimation and map building [21]. Dense approaches have a prospective advantage over feature-based and sparse approaches as they use all available information and thus do not depend on reliable feature extraction or availability of such features.In contrast to these developments, current 3D laser-based mapping systems mainly accomplish the estimation relying on feature-based solutions [34,35], reduced map representations [14,13], voxel grid-based methods [16], or point sub-sampling [30], which all effectively reduce the data used for alignment. Compared to most indoor applications using RGB-D sensors, we have to tackle additional challenges in outdoor applications using 3D laser sensors, i.e., (1) fast sensor movement resulting in large displacements between scans, (2) comparably sparse point clouds, and (3) large-scale environments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the scanning rate is slow, a scan cannot be consider as a rigid body but distortion is present due to external motion of the laser scanner. To date, it has been shown that motion can be recovered with a laser scanner itself (Ceriani, Sanchez, Taddei, Wolfart, & Sequeira, ; Velas, Spanel, & Herout, ; Wei, Wu, & Fu, ). This requires a motion model being involved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%