2014
DOI: 10.1193/122813eqs298m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collapse Risk of Buildings in the Pacific Northwest Region due to Subduction Earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The design of this building fully complies with modern US standards for RC frame design (encompassing requirements that include, but are not limited to, span-to-depth ratio requirements, shear requirements, deflection limitations, and special moment frame detailing [34]). Furthermore, the design of the cantilever structure was conducted following the same rigorous framework [9,30,31] that were used in designing the regular geometry structures to ensure comparability of the designs. The buildings are all designed assuming they are located at a southern California site at 33.996°N, 118.162°W.…”
Section: Structural Designsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The design of this building fully complies with modern US standards for RC frame design (encompassing requirements that include, but are not limited to, span-to-depth ratio requirements, shear requirements, deflection limitations, and special moment frame detailing [34]). Furthermore, the design of the cantilever structure was conducted following the same rigorous framework [9,30,31] that were used in designing the regular geometry structures to ensure comparability of the designs. The buildings are all designed assuming they are located at a southern California site at 33.996°N, 118.162°W.…”
Section: Structural Designsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Two building configurations are considered: regular geometries ( Figure 1), and cantilever geometries ( Figure 2). The regular structures were designed for previous studies by [9,30,31]. A frame building with cantilevers is designed by the authors to modern US building standards (Table I) and included in this study because buildings containing cantilevered elements have been previously shown to be sensitive to vertical ground motions (e.g., [32,33]).…”
Section: Structural Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This set is an expanded version of the far-field ground motion set used in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) P695 [30] and in this paper is referred to as the FEMA ground motion set. The second set, compiled by Raghunandan et al [31], consists of 77 earthquake records, 42 of which are long-duration recordings from large-magnitude (6.8-9.0M w ) subduction interface events, and the remaining 35 are short-duration recordings selected from the expanded FEMA set. For this paper, this ground motion set is referred to as the crustal/subduction set.…”
Section: A New Intensity Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above two studies, the ground motions are generated through a stochastic model and did not consider mainshock and aftershock (MS-AS) sequences. Raghunandan et al (2015) reported collapse risk assessment of older and newer RC buildings located in the Pacific Northwest subject to subduction and crustal earthquakes. Their study showed that subduction earthquakes contributed to the majority of the collapse risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%