2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.regen.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collagen morphology influences macrophage shape and marker expression in vitro

Abstract: Fibrosis is a process in which an accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) leads to an impaired function of the affected organ. Pulmonary fibrosis is the end-stage of several lung diseases, characterized by scarring of the lungs. Although macrophages are known to be important players in ECM homeostasis, their ability to respond to fibrosis-related morphological and mechanical changes of the ECM is relatively unexplored. In this study we aimed to elucidate the effect of ECM stiffness and morphology on macroph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent report suggested that MHC-II expression is regulated via exogenous mechanical signals by activation of the p38 MAPK pathway [32] which might explain the differential gene expression of MHC-II in our case. fibrous form at the microscopic level, as reported [36]. This suggests that CD206 expression is sensitive to the biophysical changes of cellular microenvironments.…”
Section: Dense Matrix Enhanced Expression Of Mhc-ii Cd163 and Cd206supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent report suggested that MHC-II expression is regulated via exogenous mechanical signals by activation of the p38 MAPK pathway [32] which might explain the differential gene expression of MHC-II in our case. fibrous form at the microscopic level, as reported [36]. This suggests that CD206 expression is sensitive to the biophysical changes of cellular microenvironments.…”
Section: Dense Matrix Enhanced Expression Of Mhc-ii Cd163 and Cd206supporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, we found upregulation of CD206 gene expression in dense collagen matrix in all macrophages. The expression level of CD206 was reported to be correlated to collagen morphology, because collagen can exist in the globular or fibrous form at the microscopic level, as reported [36]. This suggests that CD206 expression is sensitive to the biophysical changes of cellular microenvironments.…”
Section: Dense Matrix Enhanced Expression Of Mhc-ii Cd163 and Cd206mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Similarly, comparison of hyaluronic acid hydrogels to hyaluronic acid–gelatin hydrogels identified more attachment of peripheral blood‐derived monocytes to the hyaluronic acid–gelatin hydrogels, due to the higher number of cell‐binding motifs in the latter [45]. Moreover, coating surfaces with collagen type I induced polarization of alveolar macrophages towards a more anti‐inflammatory MHCII Lo ‐CD206 Hi phenotype compared with macrophages cultured on uncoated surfaces [46]. Similarly, in an in vitro experiment with mouse bone marrow‐derived macrophages, a collagen type I coating yielded more arginase‐1‐producing macrophages compared with fibronectin‐coated surfaces, suggesting differential effects of distinct ECM proteins probably driven by their distinct cell‐binding domains [26].…”
Section: Biochemical Interactions Between Fibrotic Stroma and Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of studies investigating the interactions of these altered structures with macrophages is limited as the post‐translational modifications observed in fibrosis are not well characterized and are difficult to mimic in vitro . From our own studies and studies in the field of biomaterials, we know that the surface or scaffold topography can modulate macrophage behaviour, but translation into a fibrotic context is challenging [46,67].…”
Section: Macrophage Responses To Biophysical Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrophages expressing Ym1 appear red-fluorescent due to Ym1-antibody labelling upon excitation at 547 nm (Bujisic and Martinon, 2017;Raes et al, 2005;Vasse et al, 2018). For each sample, 5 randomly chosen images were taken.…”
Section: Ym1 Secretion To Distinguish M1-and M2-phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%