2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collagen Fingerprinting: A New Screening Technique for Radiocarbon Dating Ancient Bone

Abstract: Collagen is the dominant organic component of bone and is intimately locked within the hydroxyapatite structure of this ubiquitous biomaterial that dominates archaeological and palaeontological assemblages. Radiocarbon analysis of extracted collagen is one of the most common approaches to dating bone from late Pleistocene or Holocene deposits, but dating is relatively expensive compared to other biochemical techniques. Numerous analytical methods have previously been investigated for the purpose of screening o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the method can easily be applied to a wide range of vertebrate taxa worldwide and although more useful in identifying fragmentary bone that cannot be identified morphologically, in cases with morphologically similar taxa such as this, or with sheep/goat (Buckley et al ., ; Buckley and Kansa, ), the approach could be much more cost‐effective and, at times, more reliable than hiring a specialist morphologist; depending on sample size, these analyses can also leave the remains morphologically intact so that future investigations can be carried out on the fragmentary assemblage. The method is also highly complementary with other archaeological science methods that are based on collagen extraction, such as radiocarbon dating (Harvey et al ., ) and stable‐isotope analysis (van der Sluis et al , ). Investigators could utilize the combined approaches to better understand the palaeoecology of particular regions with improved chronologies of particular taxa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the method can easily be applied to a wide range of vertebrate taxa worldwide and although more useful in identifying fragmentary bone that cannot be identified morphologically, in cases with morphologically similar taxa such as this, or with sheep/goat (Buckley et al ., ; Buckley and Kansa, ), the approach could be much more cost‐effective and, at times, more reliable than hiring a specialist morphologist; depending on sample size, these analyses can also leave the remains morphologically intact so that future investigations can be carried out on the fragmentary assemblage. The method is also highly complementary with other archaeological science methods that are based on collagen extraction, such as radiocarbon dating (Harvey et al ., ) and stable‐isotope analysis (van der Sluis et al , ). Investigators could utilize the combined approaches to better understand the palaeoecology of particular regions with improved chronologies of particular taxa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the more appropriate approach would clearly be the use of radiocarbon ( 14 C) dating, the majority of microfaunal bone fragments are typically too small. Additionally, assuming that the bone specimens were large enough for dating, this remains a pursuit that is orders of magnitude more costly where ZooMS collagen fingerprint analysis can identify samples that are ideal for collagenbased 14 C dating (Harvey et al 2016) from large assemblages such as seen in Pin Hole Cave.…”
Section: Post-translational Modifications For Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and has also been suggested as a reliable screening method for radiocarbon dating (Harvey et al . ). However, collagen from archaeological bones often undergoes extensive degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%