1992
DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.20.4.491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collagen deposition and the reversal of coronary reserve in cardiac hypertrophy.

Abstract: The aim of this study was to clarify how collagen deposition or medial hypertrophy of the vascular wall affects the coronary dilator reserve in pressure-overloaded hearts and whether inhibition of collagen deposition reverses the abnormalities after relief of pressure overload. We used ascending aortic banding and debanding methods and superimposed /J-amlnopropionitrile in some of the banded rats (50 mg/kg i.p., twice a day). Ten weeks of banding increased in vivo peak systolic left ventricular pressure and pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the facts that in various animal experimental models other factors, such as perfusion pressure (7), heart rate (9), extravascular compression forces (8,28), vascular remodeling due to medial thickening (2) or perivascular fibrosis (11), and coronary capillary resistance (12), have been implicated in the alterations of maximal myocardial perfusion, their contribution to the difference in the level of maximal perfusion in our two groups of infarcted rats cannot be excluded. However, since our data indicate that perfusion pressure, heart rate, and the size of capillary bed were similar in MI ϩ IVA and MI rats, neither of these factors could affect the level of maximal myocardial perfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Considering the facts that in various animal experimental models other factors, such as perfusion pressure (7), heart rate (9), extravascular compression forces (8,28), vascular remodeling due to medial thickening (2) or perivascular fibrosis (11), and coronary capillary resistance (12), have been implicated in the alterations of maximal myocardial perfusion, their contribution to the difference in the level of maximal perfusion in our two groups of infarcted rats cannot be excluded. However, since our data indicate that perfusion pressure, heart rate, and the size of capillary bed were similar in MI ϩ IVA and MI rats, neither of these factors could affect the level of maximal myocardial perfusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, perivascular fibrosis may have also impaired the vasodilatory ability. The importance of periarteriolar collagen for diminished coronary flow reserve was elucidated by Isoyama et al (16). Normalization of arterial pressure after debanding of the rat aorta induced regression of medial hypertrophy, but normalization of coronary flow reserve was achieved only after the additional reversal of colla- gen accumulation in the adventitia (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] Myocardial fibrosis accounts for the development of LV diastolic dysfunction 25 and for the impairment of coronary vasodilator reserve. 4,5,26 The development of reactive myocardial fibrosis in hypertension is related to a stimulated RAAS that was finally proved at the cellular level where angiotensin II stimulates fibroblast-mediated collagen synthesis in a dose-dependent manner and suppresses collagenase activity, synergistically leading to progressive collagen accumulation within the cardiac interstitium. 27,28 Perivascular fibrosis is seen in both the right and left ventricles and extends to the adjacent interstitial space to rise to interstitial fibrosis after angiotensin II treatment, 29 accompanied by a cellular response of myocytes and macrophages in the media.…”
Section: Coronary Blood Flow Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%