2015
DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2015.1103663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative Research to Support Reflexive Feminist Professional Work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We come from different researcher positions—embracing both qualitative and post-qualitative positionalities. Just as Claiborne et al (2015, p. 267) observed during their collaborative memory work, there can be “difficulties in embracing group coherence without homogenizing intra-group differences.” The experience was very generative as we each introduced concepts to the group that was new to other members. We actively listened to each other, permitting silences and negotiating the spaces of in-betweenness, where new understanding co-emerged.…”
Section: Making Methods Stuttermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We come from different researcher positions—embracing both qualitative and post-qualitative positionalities. Just as Claiborne et al (2015, p. 267) observed during their collaborative memory work, there can be “difficulties in embracing group coherence without homogenizing intra-group differences.” The experience was very generative as we each introduced concepts to the group that was new to other members. We actively listened to each other, permitting silences and negotiating the spaces of in-betweenness, where new understanding co-emerged.…”
Section: Making Methods Stuttermentioning
confidence: 99%