2005
DOI: 10.1080/00131910500279551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out by Cutrim Schmid (2008) for example, the actual type of interaction with the board is important and there is evidence (see, Zevenbergen & Lerman, 2008, for example) that frequent low level interaction with the board may have a detrimental effect on the depth of cognitive engagement (see further discussion below). Armstrong, et al (2005) consider classroom change with the introduction of IWBs and find that the role of the teacher is pivotal to these changes. Glover and Miller (2001) concur, identifying three types of teachers with differing attitudes towards the adoption of IWBs: missioners, tentatives and Luddites.…”
Section: Potential Benefits Of Iwbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out by Cutrim Schmid (2008) for example, the actual type of interaction with the board is important and there is evidence (see, Zevenbergen & Lerman, 2008, for example) that frequent low level interaction with the board may have a detrimental effect on the depth of cognitive engagement (see further discussion below). Armstrong, et al (2005) consider classroom change with the introduction of IWBs and find that the role of the teacher is pivotal to these changes. Glover and Miller (2001) concur, identifying three types of teachers with differing attitudes towards the adoption of IWBs: missioners, tentatives and Luddites.…”
Section: Potential Benefits Of Iwbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IWB use relates to the teacher's and students' perceptions of how it can be used as being critical agents in mediating the software to promote quality interactions and enhance interactivity in the process of changing their pedagogic practices to understand and unpack the complexities of their students [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pese a que su creación data de hace más de una década, su uso aún no se ha generalizado. En el ámbito internacional Reino Unido, Estados Unidos y Australia son los países con una mayor implantación de esta tecnología por la fuerte inversión que han desarrollado sus gobiernos (Armstrong, 2005;Holmes, 2009). Le siguen países como Canadá, Francia, Dinamarca y México, lugares donde también se han efectuado un importante número de investigaciones.…”
Section: Teorías Sobre La Pizarra Digital Interactivaunclassified