2016
DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2016.1209176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative professional development for distributed teacher leadership towards school change

Abstract: Professional development that aims to build school change capacity requires spaces for collaborative action and reflection. These spaces should promote learning and foster skills for distributed leadership in managing school change.The present study analyses the case of the Seminar for Critical Citizenship (SCC) established by teachers of infant, primary, secondary and higher education to experiment with and share innovative practices. A focus group was formed firstly to identify which factors SCC participants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
22
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, collaboration is not easily fostered in the educational context, since schools are loosely coupled systems (Orton and Weick, 1990): it is common for teachers to mainly focus on their own classroom (practice) and tasks, resulting in their work activities being largely autonomous and isolated (Admiraal et al, 2012). Consequently, innovation in schools is often seen as an isolated activity of one teacher or a minority of teachers who decide to initiate change (Sales et al, 2016). This hinders innovation, since we know that teachers in schools with collaborative structures and cultures tend to learn more from each other as compared to schools without collaboration (Drago-Severson, 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Collaborative Innovation In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, collaboration is not easily fostered in the educational context, since schools are loosely coupled systems (Orton and Weick, 1990): it is common for teachers to mainly focus on their own classroom (practice) and tasks, resulting in their work activities being largely autonomous and isolated (Admiraal et al, 2012). Consequently, innovation in schools is often seen as an isolated activity of one teacher or a minority of teachers who decide to initiate change (Sales et al, 2016). This hinders innovation, since we know that teachers in schools with collaborative structures and cultures tend to learn more from each other as compared to schools without collaboration (Drago-Severson, 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Collaborative Innovation In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values such as innovations, openness, experimentation, as well as the promotion of cooperation, collegiality, participation, co-decision have been marked by teachers as the least appreciated in schools. Many authors emphasize the importance of collaboration in introducing innovations and increasing the efficiency of schools (Angelides, 2010;Butler, & Schnellert, 2012;Crawford, 2012;Jappinen, Leclerc, & Tubin, 2016;Krichesky, & Murillo, 2018;Munoz, 2009;Sales, Moliner, & Amat, 2017). Slovakia was implemented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finalmente, es necesario reconocer el liderazgo ejercido por los maestros y las maestras del CRA. Un liderazgo que empieza a situarse dentro de los parámetros que en investigación educativa reconocemos como "liderazgo distribuido" (Sales et al, 2016;Spillane, 2005). Un modelo de liderazgo central en las experiencias de escuelas democráticas y en los modelos de justicia social.…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified