Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a vocabulary intervention delivered by teachers collaborating with speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the classroom as compared with teachers in a noncollaborating condition. Method: This quasi-experimental study employed a collaboration treatment condition ( n = 2 collaborative pairs, n = 34 students) and a comparison condition ( n = 2 noncollaborating teachers, n = 34 students). In both conditions, versions of the Vocabulary Scenario Technique were implemented. Third-grade students completed vocabulary assessments for three vocabulary tasks. Results on each of the measures were analyzed using a two-factor split-plot analysis of variance. Results: A significant interaction effect on the Words-in-Context (WIC) task, with a medium effect size ( f = .28), supported the value-added impact of having the SLP collaborate directly with the teacher in implementing the approach. Gains on the Synonyms and Non-Example measures were not significantly different between the conditions, but large effects were found for all three tasks within the collaboration condition, whereas gains in the comparison condition showed large effects for the Synonyms task only and medium effects for the WIC and Non-Example tasks. Conclusions: SLPs' contributions within their collaborations were associated with gains that were larger than those made by students in classrooms where teachers did not collaborate with SLPs on a vocabulary task requiring application of word meanings in sentences. Clinical implications and areas for future research are discussed.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a vocabulary intervention delivered by teachers collaborating with speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the classroom as compared with teachers in a noncollaborating condition. Method: This quasi-experimental study employed a collaboration treatment condition ( n = 2 collaborative pairs, n = 34 students) and a comparison condition ( n = 2 noncollaborating teachers, n = 34 students). In both conditions, versions of the Vocabulary Scenario Technique were implemented. Third-grade students completed vocabulary assessments for three vocabulary tasks. Results on each of the measures were analyzed using a two-factor split-plot analysis of variance. Results: A significant interaction effect on the Words-in-Context (WIC) task, with a medium effect size ( f = .28), supported the value-added impact of having the SLP collaborate directly with the teacher in implementing the approach. Gains on the Synonyms and Non-Example measures were not significantly different between the conditions, but large effects were found for all three tasks within the collaboration condition, whereas gains in the comparison condition showed large effects for the Synonyms task only and medium effects for the WIC and Non-Example tasks. Conclusions: SLPs' contributions within their collaborations were associated with gains that were larger than those made by students in classrooms where teachers did not collaborate with SLPs on a vocabulary task requiring application of word meanings in sentences. Clinical implications and areas for future research are discussed.
Purpose: This clinical focus article reports on an innovative program that provides classroom-based speech and language services to school children receiving speech-language therapy while addressing the need for clinical placements for graduate students in speech-language pathology. This program evaluation report centers around the logic model used to develop and implement the program. Method: The program was implemented in partnership between a university program in speech-language pathology and a nearby school district. The program took place in two different schools within the district, each with one state licensed and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association–certified speech-language pathologist (SLP) who supervised two or three graduate student interns per year of the project for a total of 17 graduate students over 3 years. Data sources for this program evaluation included child-level data collected by graduate student interns, teacher satisfaction surveys, and semistructured interviews. Results: Program stakeholders including graduate student interns, speech-language pathology supervisors, and the school district administrator provided converging positive feedback about the program implementation. This was corroborated by favorable ratings from teachers who collaborated with graduate student interns and an increase in the number of classroom-based intervention hours for school children receiving speech-language services. Conclusions: The short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes of the program's logic model were achieved in part or fully as supported by data sources used for program evaluation procedures. Clinical implications are provided about the need for innovation in school-based services with a focus on collaborative classroom-based intervention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.