2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40686-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative Mapping of an Earthquake Damaged Building via Ground and Aerial Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the system is readily extendable to groups of more than two robots. The approaches of Michael et al [10] and Forster et al [11] are conceptually similar to ours, yet based on geometric registration, which is known to be sensitive to initial guesses. We experimentally demonstrate that our feature-based visual localization and mapping framework enables reliable operation of both aerial and ground robots using a single map -despite the strongly varying viewpoints of the different agents, and without requiring prior information about the relative poses of the robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Hence, the system is readily extendable to groups of more than two robots. The approaches of Michael et al [10] and Forster et al [11] are conceptually similar to ours, yet based on geometric registration, which is known to be sensitive to initial guesses. We experimentally demonstrate that our feature-based visual localization and mapping framework enables reliable operation of both aerial and ground robots using a single map -despite the strongly varying viewpoints of the different agents, and without requiring prior information about the relative poses of the robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In most related works, the aerial robot flies outdoors higher than 20 meters, and can be localized using GPS [7]- [9]. To the best of our knowledge, the work in [1] is the first to demonstrate how a MAV could assist a ground robot in close collaboration in mapping a damaged building indoors. In their configuration, the ground-robot is equipped with a laser rangefinder and the flying robot with both a laser rangefinder and a RGBD sensor.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground robot, on the other hand, can carry more payload such as active depth sensors, processors and may be equipped with a manipulator arm. The usefulness of such a heterogeneous robot team in a disaster scenario has recently been demonstrated in [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative range or relative bearing between different mobile robots, observed by binocular cameras, monocular cameras or other kinds of sensors, is exchanged among the mobile robot group [1,7]. In addition, the performance of this kind of navigation scheme, which is called cooperative navigation, is superior to the one of the separate navigation scheme [8,9]. In a cooperative navigation system, the performance of a low accuracy navigation system will be improved significantly by utilizing the navigation information from a high accuracy navigation system [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%