Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning - CSCL '99 1999
DOI: 10.3115/1150240.1150317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
133
0
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
133
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…De Jong et al 2002;Veerman 2000). Writing notes, re-reading and re-thinking those notes are regarded as important tools for learning and knowledge construction in CSCL (De Jong et al 2002;Veerman 2000). In the present study, these online activities thus helped students in the IB condition ''catch up'' with the students in the ID condition.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…De Jong et al 2002;Veerman 2000). Writing notes, re-reading and re-thinking those notes are regarded as important tools for learning and knowledge construction in CSCL (De Jong et al 2002;Veerman 2000). In the present study, these online activities thus helped students in the IB condition ''catch up'' with the students in the ID condition.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Through writing notes in CSCL, students can re-construct their thoughts while formulating and organizing ideas and opinions and they can also re-read posted notes by looking at the conversation history (e.g. De Jong et al 2002;Veerman 2000). Writing notes, re-reading and re-thinking those notes are regarded as important tools for learning and knowledge construction in CSCL (De Jong et al 2002;Veerman 2000).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It might also be that the students did not adopt the usability of the sentence openers because it seemed unnatural to them and it hindered them in providing quick responses, or it may have been that the students did not want to keep their group members waiting. Synchronous chat programs have a fleeting character (Veerman & Veldhuis-Diermanse 2001). Because students take numerous turns, the pressure to react quickly is high.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in CMC tends to be clustered around academic sites (e.g., McKenzie and Murphy, 2000;Montero Watts and Garcia-Carbonnell , 2007;Marra, Moore and Klimczak, 2004;Lester and Paulus, 2011;Schrire, 2006;Paulus, 2007;Veerman and Veldhuis-Diermanse, 2001;Jordan, Schallert, Park, Lee, Chaing and Cheng, 2012); online support groups for people with physical or mental health issues such as eating disorders (e.g., Stommel and Koole, 2010;Giles, 2006), self-harming (e.g., Smithson, Sharkey, Hewis, Jones, Emmens, Ford and Owens 2011) and depression (e.g., Morrow, 2006;Chirrey, 2011); and blogs (e.g., Myers, 2010). Appearing less frequently as a focus of research are sites such as product review sites (e.g., Otterbacher, 2011) and professional practice forums (e.g., Crane, 2011;.…”
Section: Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%