Collaborative Learning in Engineering Students: Gender and Achievement

Abstract

Background Collaboration is an ABET accreditation required component of the engineering curriculum. Research has shown that collaborative learning positively influences student achievement. The relationship between motivation, collaborative learning strategies, and achievement is not well studied in an engineering education context. Purpose(Hypothesis) A set of hypotheses were tested that predicted positive relationships between students' self‐reported informal collaboration, self‐efficacy for learning course material, knowledge building behaviors, and course grade. A second set of hypotheses were tested that predicted gender similarities in reported self‐efficacy, and gender differences in reported collaborative learning activities. Design/Method One hundred fifty engineering students were surveyed for study 1 and 513 students were surveyed for study 2. Bivariate correlations were completed to examine relationship between study variables; multiple regression analysis was completed to examine predictive ability of variables on course grade; MANOVA was completed to examine multivariate relationship between variables. Results In study 1, students' reported use of collaborative learning strategies and reported self‐efficacy for learning course material were significantly predictive of their course grade. In study 2, female students reported greater use of collaboration as a learning strategy than their male classmates; among male and female students combined, those who received “B's” in their engineering course reported more collaboration than their peers who received “A's” or “C's” and lower. Conclusion Overall, students' self reported collaborative learning strategies were associated with increased self‐efficacy for learning course material and course grade, particularly for students who received “B's” in the course. Female students reported greater use of collaborative learning strategies than their male peers.

The effects of blog-mediated peer feedback on learners’ motivation, collaboration, and course satisfaction in a second language writing course

“…The questionnaire was adapted from dozens of other studies with five thematic constructs: feedback (Strijbos, Narciss, & Dünnebier, 2010), motivation (Nie & Lau, 2010), collaboration (Stump, Hilperta, Husman, Chung, & Kim, 2011), and course satisfaction (Lee, Srinivasan, Trail, Lewis, & Lopez, 2011). All of the constructs were measured through the use of 5-point Likert-type scales (1=completely disagree; 5=completely agree).…”

Project-based learning in Geotechnics: cooperative versus collaborative teamwork

“…The motivation for such approach and its link with reality may not be clear to students: "The only motivation that students get-if any-is that the material will be important later in the curriculum or in their careers" (Prince and Felder, 2006). Detractors of this model claim it promotes passive learning and compartmentalised curriculum; and it does not prepare students to engage in typical professional collaborative partnerships (Stump et al, 2011).…”

Social Belonging and First-Year Engineering Mathematics: A Collaborative Learning Intervention

“…18 Engineering students' self-reported use of collaborative learning strategies have been found to be predictive of course performance. 19 The effects of CL on achievement are primarily manifested in improved scores on instructor-created exams, as compared with standardized assessments. The method by which groups are composed, whether through self-selection, random assignment, or non-random assignment by instructor, does not impact these findings.…”

“…20 Furthermore, students' confidence in their ability to learn course material, or self-efficacy, is related to students' use of CL strategies. 19 Most relevant to the experience of at-risk students, a CL environment improves students' ability to manage difficulties and persist following failure. 23 An effect size of 0.46 on student persistence is typical in the studies of CL in post-secondary education, an effect strong enough to reduce attrition from STEM courses and programs by 22%.…”

“…The surveys examined perceptions of belonging and other factors hypothesized to be impacted by experience with cooperative learning during the semester: perceptions of belonging uncertainty, 8 sense of belonging to math, 7 collaborative activity, 19,25 and attitudes towards collaboration.…”