2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative Learning for Outcome Based Engineering Education: A Lean Thinking Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The EC-DT algorithm is selected to analyze the assessment management module in the HRM system. The selected indicators include team spirit (TS), sense of responsibility (R), creation spirit (CS), working ability (WA), morality and deeds (MD), communication and coordination (CC), and cost awareness (CA) [ 25 ]. The classification effect is evaluated by scoring results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EC-DT algorithm is selected to analyze the assessment management module in the HRM system. The selected indicators include team spirit (TS), sense of responsibility (R), creation spirit (CS), working ability (WA), morality and deeds (MD), communication and coordination (CC), and cost awareness (CA) [ 25 ]. The classification effect is evaluated by scoring results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize, the transfer of Lean thinking from the manufacturing sector to the education sector, in particular to HEIs, has profound effects on the productivity and engagement of students, as well as the efficiency of teaching methodologies and techniques. Lean thinking creates an educational environment that aims for continuous improvement, through the reduction of non-value-added wastes and collaborative, heterogenous learning, as implied by Bhat et al [16]. However, the successful introduction of Lean thinking methodologies into HEIs is only effective when the entire organization adopts the idea, as efficient channels of communication are required between departments.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prinsip ini merupakan tindakan dasar bagi seseorang yang ingin menambah wawasan atau pengetahuan. Di jenjang perguruan tinggi, tingkat berpikir mahasiswa dalam belajar diharapkan pada standar yang kompleks yaitu level empat hingga level enam (Bhat et al, 2020;Surya & Syahputra, 2017;Zubaidah et al, 2017). Pada level yang lebih tingga, standar manajemen informasi di kalangan mahasiswa masih berkategori tinggi.…”
Section: Manajemen Informasiunclassified